Quantcast
Channel: letters to sweethearts – A Century Back

Diana Manners Has One More Quiet Night; Wilfred Owen Embittered; Rowland Feilding on Punishment Due; Agnes Miller, Impertinent Hussy, Revisits a Loving Correspondence

$
0
0

Diana Manners doesn’t trust the rumors of the war’s imminent demise, nor is she confident that her Duff, whose leave will shortly expire, will remain safe.

Arlington Street October 15

This is my last quite peaceful night. Tomorrow I shall start the old weary season of tormenting days and nights — fears for your body, sadness for your mind and brave spirits, too fine and elect to suffer the tired despair of the war.[1]

She is anticipating too anxiously, here: first of all, Duff may not have been quite clear as to how long his leave was likely to last, and then there is the fact that his battalion must rest and refit before being sent back into the line… Really, she should be more worried about whether Paris can suffer his body and brave spirits…

 

Unlike the 3rd Grenadier Guards, Wilfred Owen‘s 2nd Manchesters, however battered, are being resupplied in place, receiving replacements without leaving the immediate rear. But they have heard the recent news of armistice negotiations with guarded celebration.

15 October
Dearest Mother;

No change of situation, except that I now live in a tent, & a change of weather has made the place more miserable. On the night when the news was officially sent us of the German ‘Acceptance’ we spent a merry enough night; I even discovered I could sing.

He sings, but he keeps inverted commas around that “acceptance” of an armistice…

We still hope something may be concluded by the Mixed Commission before we go into the line again. By we I mean every officer & man left of the legions who have suffered and are dust.

This must have been an almost unbearable tension–a more terrible time, in the war’s ironic way, then those horrible weeks when failed offensives still ground on, throwing men into a pointless disaster. Here, by contrast, is a successful offensive that may still squander lives to no purpose. Owen is quoting, by the way, as well: the last line comes from Sassoon‘s “Prelude: The Troops,” the poem which had once caught Thomas Hardy’s attention.

Owen’s next, brief, subject is the way in which the news of the possible armistice is received by the fighting men:

I am not depressed even by Bottomley’s ‘NO! NO! NO!’.

It has had the effect of turning the whole army against its John Bull at last. My heart has been warmed by the curses I have heard levelled at the Daily Mail.

The men of the army are turning, at last, against the rabble-rousing anti-German press.

Next, Owen, too, acknowledges the same, minor-key irony of losing a friend and mentor in his sleep, in London. There may be a natural connection here in Owen’s train of thoughts, though he doesn’t mention it explicitly: Ross’s death was surely hastened by the gleeful attention of the tabloids to the Pemberton Billing affair–another casualty of the press doing the dirty work of distracting the popular mind from the prolongation of the war for purposes of profit and imperial consolidation… or so Sassoon would once have argued…

Robbie Ross’s death is more affecting to me, almost, than many of the deaths that took place at my side. Thank you so much for the paragraph from the Times. It was marvellously true of him, and kind, considering the Times was never his friend.

If even the John Bull crowd is ready for peace perhaps the experiential gulf can be bridged, now? Can the men at the front and the people at home make common cause?

A Senior Lieutenant has turned up from Leave so I am now only Second in Command of D. Coy. He has returned from his first visit to London utterly disgusted with England’s indifference to the real meaning of the war as we understand it.

Apparently not. An unusually ornery Wilfred Owen continues, fed up with everything. Even his mother’s socks!

The Parcel came all right; my only grouse is that it was too big. Suppose it had reached me nearer the line I should have had to dump most of it: as every ounce tells on the back after the tenth muddy mile and the fourth sleepless night.

Please note, once more, that I don’t want old, shrunk, darned socks. No use at all. I must have new ones if my feet are to remain ‘beautiful on the mountains’ of victory, Nothing now lacks–but in, say, a week’s time, you might send only

(1 small writing pad.
(1 small Toilet Paraffin.
(2 Munchies.

This letter really does stagger–over to the question of the parcels, then back again to Owen’s rising anger at the war’s continuation.

…Only Lt. Gregg died of wounds. I had known him in Scarborough. He had been very fond of his wife, and proud of his little daughter.

I suppose the child will be told she should be proud of Daddie, now.

I don’t like the new Coy. Officers…

Your letters of Oct. 10th & 11th & Mary s have just come. Mary’s hopes for Peace Next Summer are sanguine, not to say sanguinary. Next Summer! When Christmas is the Limit of our Extreme Patience! Time gets marvellously lengthened out between the first rustle of a shell coming down & the VRACH! It seems, when at night a plane over you shuts off its engines for a moment in order to drop a bomb, hours…[2]

 

Rowland Feilding, perhaps the most calm and continent of all our writers, must feel similarly. But he doesn’t write it, Instead, his compassion overleaps another gulf–one that is physically much smaller.

October 15, 1918. St. Venant.

I write from St. Venant, devastated by honest shell-fire—in contrast to the country we have been passing through, which has been deliberately laid waste by the enemy in the course of his retirement.

For two days, until we reached the old German front line of the summer of this year, we had marched over country and through towns as big as Portsmouth or Southampton, not one house of which has escaped the destroying hand of the enemy. This is literally and emphatically true. Not even the most humble cottage has been overlooked, so thoroughly has the work been accomplished.

During the latter part of the march we passed a woman or two, here and there, who had just returned following up the enemy’s withdrawal, to inspect the damage done to their homes.

It was very harrowing to watch them… as they searched the ruins with their handkerchiefs to their eyes, picking out bits of broken crockery or any kind of rubbish, and collecting, with the utmost care, old ragged, shell-torn or half-burnt clothing;–stuff one would think, fit only for the incinerator.

But this is not about the horror of war, in which even “honest” shell fire can ruin villages and lives like this. Feilding remains calm–and partisan. And he reminds us why Owen’s report on the men fed up with Horatio Bottomley’s warmongering are not the whole story.

It is tragic, and, if the people who were responsible for these cruel outrages are to be let off, it is all wrong. Let anyone who may have doubts on this point picture his wife or mother returning to her home to find every particle of furniture, everything of any value, gone: the rest buried under a heap of brick-dust, produced—not by shell-fire or the accident of war—but wantonly, by organized gangs of destroyers employing high-explosive. And this description applies to hundreds of square miles of territory, including endless villages, towns, and cities—and big ones, too. Thank God, I say on this occasion, we British are not famed for being “thorough.”[3]

No wonder the terms of the armistice are not so easy to settle…

 

Finally, today, a century back, a rare chance to hear from Agnes Miller, the fiancée of Olaf Stapledon. His letters begging her to come to Europe and be married to him at once have been received. And although the war seems to be ending, she is in agreement, and willing to come even if it shouldn’t…

“Germany surrenders.” “Cessation of hostilities.” “Peace in sight” & on. We couldn’t really believe it—it seemed too big to be true, & in fact the morning papers of the next day were much calmer. What do you think about it? Could it have been the basis of a satisfactory peace, or was it only a ‘try-on’ on Germany’s part? I don’t believe in a compromise at this stage. I want it to be fixed up & finished off so that there won’t ever be another war. Anyway the Allies are advancing while the governments are talking, so between the two of them may we not hope for Peace before so very long?

Much wiser, I think, than Owen’s (utterly, completely understandable) hope for immediate cessation of Feilding’s evident zest for a punitive peace.

She will hope. But, brave and practical, she plans, too:

On the strength of this & in the face of the awful submarine disaster of the “Leinster,” Dad went today to interview the Chief Collector of Customs with regard to my passport. He began by being very discouraging & said it was most unadvisable to travel as “at the present time” the submarine menace was more formidable than it had been at any period of the war. Dad explained that he didn’t propose for me to go until about March next year, but he thought it best to make enquiries early in case I should lose time later by not having had my application in…  But Mr. Barclay said that that side of the question would not count for anything, as they were not letting women go on any pretext of work except in the case of Army nurses. But he said that the fact of our having been engaged for so long, & also the fact of your having asked me to come would be sufficient reason for securing a passport provided I could prove that I was speaking the truth & nothing but the truth. I therefore have the delightful task ahead of me of going over your ancient letters to find one which will convince the Collector of Customs that you did actually ask me to be your wife, & another to show that you also did ask me to come to England!

It’s lovely–and amusing, from my perspective–to see Agnes diving into the archive. Will she find it?

The latter I have in so many words. “I can’t come to Australia. Will you come to England?” It came by the last mail. The former is not so easy to find, as it was suffused over about a hundred letters, & never began in any one from the beginning. As a matter of fact, in the end it was I who “popped the question”—wasn’t it?!! I can’t tell the man that or he would think me an “impertinent hussy.” I’ll have a good old hunt & find something really convincing. I mean something that is suitable for publication. But isn’t it beastly? However if it gets me my passport it will be worth its beastliness. He said that of course by next March the conditions may be so altered that it is almost useless to make arrangements already but he thought I might as well come along & show my proofs & then he would speak to the Minister about it. . . .[4]

 

References and Footnotes

  1. Autobiography (Rainbow), 212.
  2. Collected Letters, 585-6
  3. War Letters to a Wife, 326-7.
  4. Talking Across the World, 330.

Alfred Hale’s Waterloo; Olaf Stapledon Back to the Painful Grind; Rowland Feilding Confronts a Question of Looting; Siegfried Sassoon is Sound Once Again

$
0
0

Today, a century back, Alfred Hale breakfasted at the Union Jack Club and then met a lady friend at Waterloo Station.

Loaded up with my haversack, water bottle and gas mask slung over my shoulders, with the ‘cello in my left hand, and the cornet and clarinet cases bulging out of the side pockets of my great-coat, I must have presented a somewhat strange sight to Rita Standen standing by the platform gates.

They are able to say a brief good-bye, but then Hale, in quick succession, manages to offend a woman giving free tea to the troops (by offering to pay) and then takes offense at the hackneyed choice (Auld Lang Syne) of the brass band that plays the troop train out of the station. As he goes to the window to wave to his friend, he is cut off by another man and forced back to his seat, denied his picturesque farewell. It is with great surprise that one realizes, eventually, that Hale did successfully get the three musical instruments onto the ship in Southampton. I had been certain they would be sat upon and wrecked, or left in an overhead storage bin…[1]

 

Olaf Stapledon, luckier in love and little knowing that Agnes Miller is preparing to hasten to him as soon as circumstances allow, is worn out, and not pleased to back at the front after his home leave. He is habitually cheerful, but it is brutal work.

October 1918

. . . This world is a weary world. I don’t like being shelled all morning, but I would far rather be shelled all of a solid week than do one journey down into the rear with badly wounded men over these awful roads at night. It is impossible not to crash into holes in the dark, and each little jolt causes cries to come from inside the bus, and a journey may take three or four hours—hours of crashing and jolting and struggling up steep slippery muddy banks on which you simply must not think about the cries that come from inside, but only of the best way of rushing the bus up—-if she will go. And my nightmare is the thought of being stuck in such a place with bad cases on board and having to wait perhaps many hours until enough people come to push me out. Generally the roads are overcrowded, but when you want people the roads are apt to be deserted for hours. Ah, bon dieu! The other day I  had a run which (all told) lasted just twelve hours, including of course much waiting and searching and one hasty meal of twenty minutes during a wait. Ten hours is quite a usual time to be away on a run. Of course part of that is with an empty car and matters not, but the rest is enough to drive one cracked. Probably all this is censorable, but one can’t always keep quiet.

And what recompense for being the chauffeur to all of this suffering?

The other day in a certain much shelled village I spent hours driving round looking for certain blesses that were reputed to be there. At the end of our exploration the colonel of a certain regiment came up and said, “I know that all your section shows complete devotion to its work, but I wish personally to thank in particular the ‘messieurs’ attached to this car for the services they have done me.” Whereat he shook hands with us both and we (in the words of my companion) looked a bigger fool than usual—because the only service we had done was narrowly to escape running over the dear old duffer in turning a corner. However we took the glory and bragged about it to our friends, who—unsympathetic brutes—merely said “toujours la politesse vers les Anglais.” This enraged us, especially as it was true.[2]

 

Rowland Feilding continues his own story of Anglo-French politesse today, a century back:

October 17, 1918

We marched again this morning still further back, to Fontes, where I write from an extremely cheerful billet, with electric light, and such a bed…

Before leaving St. Venant I presented the poor lady with whom I had been billeted with a nice chair which we have been carrying about the last few days, having “salved” it from a German Mebu near Le Maisnil. The battalion pioneers also patched up her windows with pieces cut out of an old sheet, and mended her chimney, which had been hit by a shell, so that she could light a fire.

She had lost most of her belongings—“Volé,” she said, “par les soldats Anglais.”

What?! Have the polite and helpful English allies been looting?

She took me and showed me her safe, upstairs, which I must confess had been broken open very scientifically, though fortunately, as she explained, without gain to the looter, since only unpaid bills were in it. As I was leaving she came up rather remorsefully and apologized for having said it was “les Anglais” who had done the damage. “ She had been mistaken.” It was “les Ecossais.” She little knew she hit me either way.

Feilding turns over the problem in his mind with characteristic diligence.

Perhaps it may have been true, but you must not judge too harshly. The battle line was immediately in front of the town when the incident must have happened, and the enemy was advancing fast in overwhelming numbers. No doubt some men argued: “If there is anything to be had, it is better that we should have it than the Germans.” After all, it is culpable not to destroy valuable material when it appears certain that it must fall into the hands of the enemy, so the individual soldier must not be blamed if he, being human, sometimes applies the rule to his own benefit, though one would prefer that he kept his hands clean.

It is a difficult problem. Assuming the safe to have contained cash, should it be burgled, or left to the enemy? I suppose, strictly, that it should be burgled, and the cash handed to the Higher Authorities.

But it is difficult to arrive at a correct solution of such delicate questions under heavy shell-fire.[3]

Yes: not perhaps highest on the list of war’s horrors, but well within the spectrum nonetheless, is the systematic robbing of old ladies… it’s part of the game.

And, as it happens, this sad little situation is quite similar to the small act of vandalism–English soldiers breaking up part of a farmyard shrine–which drives the plot of (possibly) my favorite (traditional) novel(s) of the war (of the war, that is, but not of the combat experience), namely Mottram’s Spanish Farm Trilogy. As the characters, French and English, negotiate their way through years of war, the peasants’ suit against the English unit that damaged their property churns ever oneward with a propriety and agonizing slowness worthy of Dickens. Ah, fiction…

 

Finally, today, Siegfried Sassoon sat for another medical board, but this one was devoid of drama. He is quite healed, physically, from his head wound, and there is no question of lingering “shell shock” or tendencies toward anti-war public statements. Instead, he quietly accepted a period of leave (not that his convalescence in Scotland, with long visits to London, has been too confining) before an expected London desk job of some sort of another. But who is to say what might happen during four long weeks of leave…[4]

 

References and Footnotes

  1. The Ordeal of Alfred M. Hale, 131-2.
  2. Talking Across the World, 331-2.
  3. War Letters to a Wife, 32-9.
  4. Moorcroft Wilson, Siegfried Sassoon, I, 514.

Duff Cooper Takes a Long, Low View; Christmas Wishes from Salter Clark; Alfred Hale Goes Hungry

$
0
0

Ladies and Gentleman, Duff Cooper has left Paris. For better or worse, he also left no record of his escapades during the last few days…

B.E.F., October 18

Amiens is rather depressing after Paris. The best rooms that we can get have neither windows nor doors, which compares so unfavourably with the Ritz. But there are beds and sheets…

Duff sounds–as he half-realizes–less like a man of the third month of the Great Advance and more like a grumpy soldier of a long war who has just had an extremely diverting leave. But why take it out on his beloved Diana, who has been so understanding as to be positively permissive, and who seems rather more wracked with worry for Duff than cheerfully optimistic about the war?

This is not a nice letter, darling, but I am feeling ever so little depressed and I am harried and hemmed in. I wish I shared your optimistic view of the war. I think people are intoxicated by victory and unless the old hope of revolution in Germany comes true I don t see how it can end for a year or two. Has Mr Wilson committed us to “unconditional surrender and no peace with the Hohenzollern?” If he has there is no hope but German revolution.[1]

 

So Duff doesn’t believe they will be home by Christmas. Salter Clark, whose travel back to New Jersey would be a bit more difficult to arrange, certainly won’t be.

Oct. 18, 1918

I am enclosing a slip to put on a Christmas package such as we sent to Carolus last year. Send some hard candy and one or two handkerchiefs. Haven’t time to write much more, as the mail is going out. We hope the war will be over soon—if the Boche is sincere in the peace offers he makes. Love to all.

Saullie.

What Clark doesn’t write is that the mail is going soon because the battalion is going into the line, with an attack planned for tomorrow.[2]

 

Finally, today, a century back, Alfred Hale woke up from his shipboard doze in a thick fog near the French coast. Although diffident in motion, he achieves a sort of old soldier’s courage in repose. When a submarine scare scrambled their escort and men rushed on deck, he stayed placidly in his bunk.

Well, it would have been a quick and merciful death, and what was the good of bothering about it? I was alive, and what about breakfast?

As it transpired, there was no breakfast, and no luncheon. The troopship had somehow damaged its propeller (no submarines materialized) and spent the day wallowing in the channel. There were dry biscuits in the afternoon, and they only limped into Le Havre long after dark. Hale’s miserable luck seems to spread to everyone around him…[3]

 

References and Footnotes

  1. Autobiography (Rainbow), 212.
  2. Clark, Coleman and Salter (privately printed), 169.
  3. The Ordeal of Alfred M. Hale, 133.

Edward Heron-Allen Flattened by Ypres; The Worries and Losses of Diana Manners and Duff Cooper; Wilfred Owen’s Presence at Christmas; Olaf Stapledon Drives a Soldier All the Way Home

$
0
0

The Cloth Hall, Ypres, probably 1918

Edward Heron-Allen had a very full day, today, a century back. He and the journalists he is accompanying (and debunking) drove through no fewer than thirteen towns, including St Omer, Poperinghe and Menin. But of course it is Ypres that grabs his attention, and leaves him as our flabbergasted surrogate, overwhelmed by the physical realities of the war.

Then we reached Ypres, which I was most particularly anxious to see–but having seen it I realised that words can hardly describe it. I thought I had seen absolute devastation and ruin at Bapaume and Péronne, but Ypres by comparison is as the Sahara to a sand dune… When, passing though some mounds of rubbish I asked where we were and was told ‘This is Ypres’, it absolutely turned me cold. Even the streets are obliterated…

Heron-Allen finds the now single-story Cloth Hall and the pile of the rubble that was the Cathedral.

I picked up a bit of glazed brick and a fragment of a shell as a souvenir…

The older mounds of rubbish, dating from September, 1914… are overgrown with weeds, and that is all that diversifies this desert–the older the ruins, the thicker the weeds, that is all. I waded through the mud of Flanders–which fully bears out all that has been written about it–to the car, very much saddened and impressed and we left Ypres between two small leveled heaps of ruins which had once been the Menin gate.[1]

 

While Heron-Allen confronts the material destruction of the war, everyone else, today, is preoccupied with maintaining the relationships that the war has so heavily stressed. Diana Manners has been consumed by worry since the time that (as she she believed) Duff Cooper might have returned to combat. Of course, that would allay other worries–it’s harder to lose your shirt gambling in a dugout than a casino. Three nights ago, a century back, she wrote this:

…I feel near tears and despairing this evening, perhaps because I have not been to bed till 2 a.m. for so many nights that my nerves are feeble. Dudley told me you had lost £200 at Mr Dod, of all idiotic games. O darling, it isn’t faithful of you. I ask no other whimsical boons. Do humour me there. Is it to be an obstacle to happiness all my life?

And today, a century back (with at least one more letter in the interim), her despair was more general than personal.

Arlington Street October 22

No letter today and Peace fading into dimmer future. They think here that the last note was humility exemplified. Your leave will be my armistice. Does it loom?[2]

And Duff? Well, he’s on his way back to the front, but he’s not there yet. No armistice to save him from the shells, and no shelling to save him from himself. Today, a century back, he combines his worst instincts with his poor judgment, which he confides to his diary rather than to dear, distant Diana…

After lunch the battalion moved back to Boussières. It was a tiresome march… I got a note from Oliver Lyttleton asking me to dine… we had a pleasant dinner and played bridge afterwards. I bet Claud Sykes £100 to £25 that there would not be peace before Christmas.

So that’s £300, no bad luck at cards required, plus whatever he lost gambling in Paris. Which is going to make marriage that much harder to achieve. Spendthrift, rake, and lousy gambler that he is, it’s hard to blame Duff for his low mood.

I forgot to say that the first news which greeted me on my return to the Battalion was that Peter Adderley had just died of wounds. It really does seem that all my friends are marked out for death. A succession of calamities has left me callous–I was really fond of Peter and yet I felt that I could not feel his death.[3]

 

While Duff Cooper grieves and neglects his most important relationship, Wilfred Owen  tends to his, his letter of today, a century back, running from upbeat filial solicitousness into a reverie of return.

Tues. Mng; 22 October 1918    (Same kitchen)

Dearest Mother,

Two days ago I was thinking a great deal of your Restoration to health, and even managed to mention it, I believe! This is fine news of your visit to Dr. Armitage.

Let nothing waver you from your treatment…

Now the reverie. Thinking about his mother’s recuperation throws Owen’s mind forward–and soon he, too, is thinking of Christmastime. He has developed an interest in decoration, and attended several antiques auctions in Scarborough, buying old treasures at distressed wartime prices. So, while he can’t be present himself to comfort her, Owen can imagine his new possessions, shipped home when he shipped out, offering a vicarious solace:

About the end of November you will start to move about your room. Your room must be arranged. All my Articles of Vertue which you like are to represent me there. My Jacobean Chest; (why not ?) my carpets; my tall candlesticks; my pictures; my tables; have them all in.

About Christmas you will start the hardening processes. You will lengthen your walks and your paces. You will grow keen with the keenness of frost and cold, blue sunlight. So you will be ready, early in February, for my Leave. We will walk to Haughmond, and while you are resting on the top, I will run round the Wrekin and back, to warm
my feet.

For even were Prussianism removed from London & Berlin and Peace happened before Christmas, I should not get home before January or February…

We move from here in a few hours not for the front… you must not conclude I am in the fighting zone. It is unlikely for a considerable time, time even for the British Government & its accomplices to save their Nations.

W.E.O. x

P.S. Thank you for everything in parcel, except socks which I had spared & exempted as unfit last August.[4]

It’s still shocking, that last bit, and a terrible rent in their relationship: she has sent him old, ill-darned socks. Where is the love?

 

Finally, today, Olaf Stapledon, little knowing that Agnes Miller has decided to hasten to him as soon as circumstances allow, is worn out by both the hypocrisies and the miseries of the front.

22 October 1918

. . . We have had another batch of citations. In fact about a quarter of the convoy sports the red and green ribbon now. The last three were earned, but some of the others have not been. In fact there have been scandals of a mild nature. Please note I shall never get one because my presence always has such a pacific influence that wherever I go the shelling stops!

Is this a joke, coming from a mystic such as Stapledon? Is he so tired of war that he will leave these discussions of fate strewn about like barely-touched meals?

…But the thing is now so horribly cheap that the glamour is wearing off, save for the ever-undecorated old fossils like Sparrow and me. Of course Sparrow should have had one before several people that have got them but he has never had the luck (?) to meet the necessary dramatic incident. He and I, on the sour-grapes principle, have decided we don’t want one now. . . .

But it still goes on, as Owen has reminded us. And as Olaf does now. Even an ambulance driver whose presence stills the shells can still suffer, at one very close remove, the agonies of war and the trauma. And he, too, must make decisions freighted with the life or death of other human beings.

Last night as I was going to sleep in my car I thought of the last person who had lain where I was lying. He was a tall, thin, blue-eyed, spectacled, intellectual-looking man who had been badly wounded. When we had loaded the car he called for the priest (a friend of mine) and asked him to kiss him. The priest did so, gently, pitifully, and murmured a prayer over him. Then we got under way, and I was perplexed whether to go slow to save him pain, or fast to save his life. I tried both in turn, & finally made a compromise. But it was a long and bumpy journey. When we had almost finished it the other men inside rattled the window to call my attention. I stopped & opened the window.

One said, “Je crois qu’il meurt.” [I think he is dying.]

Pause. “Oui, je crois qu’il est mort.” [Yes, I think he died.]

Pause. So I said (for there was nothing else to do), “Alors il n’y-a rien a faire. II n’y a qu’a filer.” [Well, there’s nothing to do. Nothing but to speed.]

So we proceeded, I now going at full speed since there was no chance of hurting him, & there might still be a chance of saving him. I nearly had a smash through scorching. We arrived & unloaded; and surely the man was quite dead, with his eyes still bright & blue and half open, and dust all over his spectacles.[5]

 

References and Footnotes

  1. Journal, 252-3.
  2. Autobiography (Rainbow), 213.
  3. Diaries, 84.
  4. Collected Letters, 588.
  5. Talking Across the World, 332.

Rowland Feilding Marches Triumphant; Herbert Read and the Modern Future; Duff Cooper to Leave Again; Agnes Miller’s Principled Pacifism

$
0
0

We’re all over the place, today, but since Rowland Feilding had to face my ire at the stupidity of punitive warfare alone, yesterday, I’ll start by letting him tell us an altogether nicer story of the liberation of Lille. When you pause a few days before making a triumphant entrance into a city, it’s not just to blanco your own kit and tune up the band: the population, too, can prepare.

October 28,1918

To-day, in glorious sunshine—the first almost for nearly two months—we marched through Lille.

We billeted last night outside the walls, in the western suburb known as Lomme, and this morning, after passing through Lille from west to east… we passed through the Grande Place—where wooden stands draped in red, white and blue had been erected, and where the Army Commander, General Birdwood, stood:—then, following the rue  Carnot, we marched on through and out of the city by the Louis XIV gate, where the bridge has been destroyed and the road mined by the enemy.

We are now billeted in an eastern suburb, en route again for the line, whose direction is indicated, it being nighttime as I write, by the flashes of the guns.

Troops of Feilding’s division marching into Lille, 28 October 1918. © IWM (Q 9630)

The day has provided a truly wonderful experience. For miles we marched through decorated streets, through immense crowds of cheering citizens. It is a miracle whence, in so short a space of time, so many flags can have been obtained. I hear that the very morning the inhabitants awoke to find the enemy gone women were to be seen running about the streets waving tricolours which had been hidden during the four years and more that Lille has been held in captivity. But whence the “trappings of to-day? Can this “curiosity of the war” be attributed to the commercial instinct of the enemy? Some people say so:—that far-seeing as he was in war he had not neglected the smallest details incidental to peace, even should the peace not be his peace. But I find it difficult to believe that his patriotism, of which there can be no possible doubt, can leave space for such paltriness as is suggested.

No, but it’s nice to see the weird spy paranoia of the early (and not so early) war turned on its head. Those clever Germans, ready to ease their way into post-war defeat with indiscriminate flag-selling!

Each battalion was headed by its band to-day, ours playing English airs as we passed through the suburbs, and bursting into the “Marseillaise” when we reached the more fashionable parts, with electrical effect upon the people
crowded on the pavements…

The ladies and children gave little souvenir flags to the men, but they fought a little shy of me. Perhaps my rather conspicuous position at the head of the battalion, mounts on a charger which, as you know, is about 17 hands high put them off. But I was determined not to be outdone, so asked one particular lady if she would give me the flag she was carrying “pour mes enfants.” This she not only did, but rushed into a house and presently brought out a bunch of little hand-painted paper flags, so that I have been able to send one to each of the children and enclose one herewith, also, for yourself.[1]

So, good: in the end the citizens of Lille are happy and Rowland Feilding has shown himself to be a thoughtful husband and father…

 

Herbert Read is at the center of a slightly smaller parade. But don’t tell that to this particular array of literary egos…

28.x.18

Met Ezra at 11:30. he is really quite a decent sort… seems rather absurd. But I believe the man is actually shy

After this latest meeting with Pound, Read takes in a concert, then attends a dinner with many of his new friends in London’s clique of Modernist artists and writers, and then makes his way (in the footsteps of Owen and Sassoon) to the home of the hippest aristocrats in the capital:

Afterwards to the Sitwells, who have a wonderful house in Chelsea, full of all things precious and extreme. Too good to live in… Lewis was there and we ‘palled on.’ I think he rather likes me because I am not of ‘the damned pseudo-artistic riff-raff.’ And I rather like Lewis. He has brains… He is very bitter about the war: he feels that four years of the most vital period of his career have been torn from his life…

The Sitwells are rather too comfortable and perhaps there is a lot of pose in their revolt. But they are my generation whereas Lewis’s is the generation before and it is with the Sitwells that I must throw in my lot…

I am meeting Osbert Sitwell on Thursday to discuss the future…[2]

It’s amusing that the Sitwells are the most catholic of the bunch, able to appreciate Owen’s gentle, truly shocking poetry as well as the blustering, ostentatiously shocking poetry of Wyndham Lewis… and probably not that surprising, given the urgency these young Moderns feel, that the mere decade between Read and the Sitwells and the 46-year-old ancient Lewis comprises an entire “generation.”

 

But then again only the son of a Yorkshire farmer would get so worked up about hitting it off with a proper upper-middle bourgeois like Lewis (a product of Rugby and various European capitals) and the likes of the Sitwells–children of a mere baronet. The daughter of a duke would have condescended effortlessly. But Diana Manners has other things on her mind today, a century back–namely the Duchess herself.

Arlington Street October 28

I had looked forward greatly to today for it was to carry Mother off to Beaudesert, and without anticipating anything illicit, by this remove made possible, I knew that I should walk with a freer step and read over my fire with more delicious calm…

Mother being out of London will be especially fortuitous if Duff Cooper‘s second leave in as many months comes through:

B.E.F. October 28

They have just come and told me that I go on leave on the 1st. It comes from the Adjutant and is probably true though it sounds too good to be. I will send you every breath of rumour of news about it every hour, but if I am lucky I may outspeed my letters.[3]

 

Finally, today, a century back, Olaf Stapledon, who is lucky in love in more ways than one. There is a long literary history of men falling in love with girls (Dante, e.g.), but even leaving aside the troubling power dynamic that comes with a significant age gap it would seem to be highly problematic for an ostensibly woman-respecting intellectual like Stapledon to have committed his love to a child: Agnes Miller is now twenty-four to his thirty-two, but she was only nine years old when they first met,and before she was anywhere near womanhood Olaf had declared his loved for her. They have been informally engaged since her late teens. Let’s assume that the sexual element in this relationship was initially absent or repressed (this seems quite likely) and that nothing unseemly (or downright awful) followed upon a young man proposing to a teen-aged girl. Still–and with (half-hearted) apologies to fully committed romantics–can “true love” really unite two minds when one of those minds is so much more fully formed than the other? At the very least, this is taking something of a gamble in terms of future intellectual sympathies. Will they ever be equals, when there was such a steep angle of experience at the beginning? And will they be intellectually compatible?

Agnes Miller can sound like an ingenue, at times, and we often see her deferring to her father or her fiancé… but this letter shows both why they surely shouldn’t have married four or five years ago and why there is good reason to hope that they might be equal partners if and when they finally do wed. She might seem to be asking for permission, but she is also asserting her right to ask the difficult questions, now, and to know what her husband-to-be is feeling in his heart of hearts.

28 October 1918

. . . I haven’t been to that man about my passport yet. It’s a case of being there early in the morning before he gets busy. . . . I have picked out a letter to show we are engaged, but I’d much rather not show it to him! I also have Auntie & Uncle’s letters of that time saying how pleased they are—that might do. They were written just about three years ago from now, but I think we have been engaged much longer than that, don’t you? That was only when it  was made public. I feel now as if we had been engaged almost ever since that first night at Hoylake [on 24 February 1913] when you told me about it, but heaven knows I didn’t feel so then! Thank goodness I came to my senses before you got fed up with me! You were a darling to wait so long & to be so horribly persistent. . . .

Olaf, there’s one thing I want you to tell me. I wish I had asked it long ago & then I should know—— If you were to be killed directly or indirectly during the war, would you be content to have it so? We must all pass on one day & leave behind people & things that we love. (No one can like to do that & to feel that one’s people are sad)—but apart from that would you give your life willingly for the cause for which England is fighting? You are so much against war as a means of securing an ideal that I have sort of got it into my head that you are not one with England’s ideal at all. And yet you must be to some extent or why are you in France? We can’t talk of these things because of the Censor, you & I, & I’m all in the dark. I don’t know this Olaf a bit. Do tell me, for it might make so much difference to me. If I felt you were content—no! proud, glad to sacrifice your life, me, everything to this ideal, I think I could be content too, & I would try to be glad. . . .

And the unasked converse, which the censor renders it unwise to discuss, is whether Olaf is miserable and furious at the idea of losing his life in the waning days of an imperial war, and whether he would have his almost-widow furious at the waste, rather than content at the sacrifice.

The letter moves on to remember a conversation they had when Agnes was in England at the war’s beginning. She remembers Olaf’s grim certainty that the war will be an epochal event, and her own failure to grasp its scope…

I do understand it now from my point—from the point of the women who stay at home & though we here have not  had the least physical discomfort to put up with—yet war is stamped on our minds as the most cruel & wicked thing that could possibly be—something we have had to bear perhaps necessarily—perhaps it might have been avoided—but at all events something which we must never never allow to happen again. In these days of discussions as to an armistice & final peace terms, it seems dreadful not to seize the first opportunity of peace & yet I’d rather it were fought on until the right terms are agreed on, than run the risk of a repetition of this awful mess.[4]

 

References and Footnotes

  1. War Letters to a Wife, 335-7.
  2. The Contrary Experience, 140-1.
  3. Autobiography (Rainbow), 214-5.
  4. Talking Across the World, 332-4.

Edward Heron-Allen Considers His Privilege, Wilfred Owen on the Ongoing Sacrifices; Olaf Stapledon Sick to Death of Blood; Alfred Hale a Child Among the Ruins; Herbert Read Plans a Movement

$
0
0

Oh, it’s one of those days, today: five different entries–and two numbered lists! But it’s not all bad…

First, a grateful return. Edward Heron-Allen‘s whirlwind tour of liberated France and Belgium has come to an end. After seeing nothing of the war for several years but rural drill grounds and London offices, he saw more of the famous towns behind the British front in a single week than all but a handful of well-traveled warriors would have seen the whole war long. After a long day made longer by an officious transport officer in Boulogne, Heron-Allen crossed in the late afternoon, and was at his London home by 9:30.

No words can express what a privilege I consider it to be, to have been afforded this opportunity of seeing the war at close quarters. I look upon the visit to the battle areas as more than ample recompense for giving up my independence and my scientific work for six months. It was the one thing needful to conclude–to crown–this journal of impressions of the Great War–for I feel, I know, that the war is very near its end. If I had had to wait another fortnight I should never have got out to France…[1]

Our most distinguished Persian translator/Forminaferan expert is, again, rather uncannily accurate in his assessment of grand strategy and the affairs of nations.

 

Wilfred Owen‘s horizon is much more limited. As in several recent letters, his patience seems short, and his two concerns are largely to get what he needs for his return to the real fighting and to reassure his mother that he is not there yet, and in no danger.

29 October 1918

Dearest Mother,

Through so much marching I have not been able to write for a day or two. I don’t want to send Field Cards in case you suppose they mean in the Line. In future, however, a F. Card will be no proof that I am actually there…

Your last letters were the two with the Permang:  & the Boric. Many many thanks for sending this so quickly.

Yesterday evening I hear the post corporal fell into a river; I understand the letters are alright, but haven’t got any yet…

But now the letter rounds into focus. It still goes on. People are still dying, and Owen is angry. If his poetry–especially his most-read poetry–can sometimes seem to concentrate intensely on the suffering of the troops, there is no such solipsism here. The continuation of a stalemate would mean that the soldiers suffer alone–but the continuation of a war of movement through unevacuated country means that, in the best old European tradition, the peasantry will suffer with them.

The civilians here are a wretched, dirty crawling community, afraid of us some of them, and no wonder after the shelling we gave them 3 weeks go.

Did I tell you that five healthy girls died of fright in one night at the last village. The people in England and France who thwarted a peaceable retirement of the enemy from these areas are therefore now sacrificing aged French peasants and charming French children to our guns. Shells made by women in Birmingham are at this moment burying little children alive not very far from here.

Owen slashes toward the heart of the matter. When does pitching in to the war effort in a righteous war become morally compromised participation in the military-industrial complex?

It is rumoured that Austria has really surrendered. The new soldiers cheer when they hear these rumours but the old ones bite their pipes, and go on cleaning their rifles, unbelieving.

Not quite, but soon.

…For my next parcel, will Mary please get:

(1 small bottle Tatcho
(1 „ Oatine
(1 pair cork boot-socks, size 6.
(20 Players.
(Chocolate.

But Owen’s righteous anger has wandered, now. He’s part of the machine now, and far more deeply implicated than those “munitionettes.” But he’s getting on with it. And he remembers, in the end, not a horrible detail but a clever line he has already shared with his cousin.

Siegfried sent me a little book which he had in France. Offered a job in War Propaganda under Beaverbrook he wrote to B’s, private sec. saying he had no qualifications for such work, except that he had been wounded in the head.

So glad you liked Tolstoy.

All my dearest love, my darling Mother. W.E.O.[2]

 

Next we have Olaf Stapledon, who is perhaps even more consistent than Owen in reassuring she who loves him best while still avoiding outright lies about the horrors of the war. But there is no room, here, for reassurance. Just as with Owen, the fact that it is nearly over makes its horrors all the more unbearable. One wonders what awful details Stapledon may be suppressing, here, as his ambulance continues to jolt along behind the French advance.

29 October 1918

. . . Blood is getting on my nerves. I sympathise with Lady Macbeth in her futile efforts to cleanse it. . . . Oh heavens, but I am sick of dealing with shattered human beings. Always noise and blood and agonies, & each single little tragedy is such a mere atom of the whole, & yet so very great in itself. . . .[3]

 

Also going forward is Alfred Hale. His work as an officer’s servant now extends to striking out toward his squadron’s new base as part of the advance party. But Hale has realized his unique situation: his incompetence is no longer something to be remedied but merely to be minimized. The sergeant in charge has also been “obviously asked… to dry-nurse me.” Hale once again acknowledges that he is a burden rather than a help–and he is grateful not to be humiliated in his incompetence. Of this sergeant’s “dry-nursing” he writes: “I have not forgotten his kindness, or ever shall.”

Hale has seen nothing of the devastated areas yet. How will this gentle, musical fellow, turned from his comfy hole in comfortable middle age to be dragged along on a quest, describe what he sees? Memorably–and it’s wonderful to compare his hazy reverie to Heron-Allen’s recent expedition.[4]

…we began very obviously to get nearer and nearer the realities of the War. In the distance the great guns ceaselessly rumbled, and each village… seemed more and more desolate-looking and deserted than the last…

It’s important to remember what we can hardly forget: that these experiences are all so subjective. The guns “ceaselessly” rumbling? Probably not. There are no major attacks going on right now, and the artillery is struggling to keep up with the advance. We will soon learn that Hale’s unit is fourteen days behind the retreating Germans, which suggests more than a few miles of empty air between him and the guns. So an experienced infantryman might guffaw at the idea of “nearer and nearer,” but how could Hale know any better?

Then even the heaps by the roadside that were once villages ceased to exist, and we entered No-Man’s Land. As far as the eye could reach was one vast plain, the terrible wastage of war, without a blade of grass or tree to be seen… I felt like being in a vast shallow saucer, of which the horizon on either side composed the rim… I sat down by the roadside on what was obviously the remains of a German dug-out, and had my meal thus, with the grey, sunless, autumn light over everything. Apparently we had strayed by accident into a recently cleared and tidied up battlefield…

After some MPs put them right–for once the mistake is not Hale’s fault–they escape the battlefield. He’s like a child among the ruins: this reads like memories of childhood, not the memoirs of a strange middle-aged interval “in parentheses.”

…soon after that we left the waste of battleground behind. The I recollect being quite comfortable and happy, sitting in a half-reclining position against the box of stores, while close to me was a large Huntley & Palmer biscuit tin! The weather being fine we had the lorry completely open with no hood up. I was really quite warm enough in my greatcoat and enjoying it all. I was quite sorry when we entered the village that was to be our destination…[5]

 

A definite anticlimax, now (with apologies) as we must keep up with Herbert Read‘s very different week in London. He is deep into charting the course of English Modernism, and he writes to Evelyn Roff with great excitement about what this future holds: himself, with some help from Ezra Pound–and funded by the Sitwells–setting up shop at the center of it all…

29.x.18

Now, before I can be intelligible, I must explain how far I have got with the future.

Decided:

(1) To chuck the Army.

(2) To take over the working secretaryship of the Allied Artists Association…

(3) To further develop the AAA by opening a permanent Gallery…

(4) If possible to run in conjunction with the Gallery a publishing and book-selling business…

Meanwhile the war had better hurry off the scene.[6]

 

References and Footnotes

  1. Journal, 270-1.
  2. Collected Letters, 589-90.
  3. Talking Across the World, 334.
  4. Hale is writing long after the war, though, while Heron-Allen was fixing up a contemporary journal.
  5. The Ordeal of Alfred M. Hale, 141-3.
  6. The Contrary Experience, 141-2.

Richard Aldington’s Life is Ruined; Olaf Stapledon’s Future Gets a Decorative Boost; Lord Dunsany’s Dirge of Victory

$
0
0

As the end draws near, we have three veterans in three very different situations today, a century back. One stands at the beginning of the end, another at the cusp of the beginning, and the third in the closely-coordinated middle. And that’s just their marriages…

 

Richard Aldington’s is falling apart. His marriage, that is: his part in the fighting of November Fourth went far more smoothly than that of his future protagonist, and the Germans are now giving way on every front. But the post from home keeps up even with the advancing troops, and he has received a disquieting letter from his wife, the poet H.D. She is now heavily pregnant, and receiving no support from the father of the child, Cecil Grey (“G.” below), who is either very ill or caddishly hiding behind an illness to avoid involving himself in the pregnancy and birth. Aldington musters scant sympathy.

8 November 1918

Dear Astraea/

I am very sorry you feel that way about things… I scarcely know what to say about it. We are fighting & advancing all the time–no rest, but we don’t mind if only it’s ending the bally business.  So you see I’m not very clear as to the best thing to say.

No doubt I have changed. It is not my fault, but a misfortune over wh: I’ve no control. As to G. — I don’t blame him. Influenza is rotten–had it myself in July.

And will Aldington be there–the husband if not the father?

I shan’t be back until the end of the month, & don’t want to come specially. This is very interesting & exciting–new towns & villages every day, enthusiastic welcomes by French people, &c &c. And then what have I to come home to? I arrive at Victoria — where am I to go? What am I to do? Arabella puts one part of London ‘out of bounds’ to me–old sentiment puts another. You are hurt and unfortunate, I know; I sympathise deeply & do all I can. But my life also is ruined. I am the only man in this battalion who is not anxious about leave!

So it seems that everyone is a victim here.

…Don’t let me hurt you. Keep proud. As to money it is not worth being proud about.

In great haste

Richard[1]

 

Olaf Stapledon, by contrast, is all done with the war, and on the cusp of marriage. Generally the most starry-eyed of all our correspondents, the stars in his eyes today are unusually earthly ones. With the months-long lag in their correspondence, Olaf does not know that Agnes Miller is preparing to set out and join him. But he hopes she will, and knows he must be ready for post-war life. So today he thinks of the future in other than purely Romantic terms: he will go home soon, but as a pacifist returning from foreign service, not a conquering hero. Will this leave him scorned, pushed aside, unemployable? He won’t be able to rest on his laurels, but perhaps a new start might be aided by some shiny stars and crosses…

8 November 1918

Did I tell you the whole Convoy has been cited again, for work during Sept. & Oct.? This time it is a divisional citation, which entitles us to a silver star alongside the gold one on the croix de guerre on the cars. Many drivers have also been given the croix de guerre, including me. Most of them have divisional citations. Sparrow’s name & mine were sent in (I am told) on the original list for divisional citation but were cut off because there were too many on the list. ‘That is what comes of spelling one’s name with a letter S instead of, say, a B or a D!

…The whole matter is a questionable institution, for it causes awful jealousies in our happy home. Decorations are bad in principle, but on the other hand they are useful assets to some people afterwards. For instance one FAU man who got a croix de guerre was delighted to receive, a bit later on, a letter raising his screw from his firm!! Moreover the general public, especially in England, where the croix de guerre seems a strange and distinguished decoration, thinks that if you have a croix de guerre you can’t have joined the FAU merely to shirk![2]

 

Finally, today, we will hear from both members of an older couple in the contented middle of their married life.[3] Beatrice, Lady Dunsany, has not paid the tax of quick alarm in some time: her husband has returned from his own sojourn (undated, alas) as an intelligence officer working behind the advancing Allied lines, and, now that he is ensconced in the War Office, they are privy to advance news of the armistice.[4]

8th November 1918

Eddie came home last night with War Office news that the war is over. I would give so much to feel joyous and elated, but instead I feel like crying when I think of it. Eddie said he had been depressed all day too. If we had been able to prophesy such a complete victory a year ago we should have been happy. But it is no use. It was too terrible; and they are all dead, Tom, John, Channy, Ledwidge and all the rest, and it is over, and we can look back on the four and a half greatest years in history and feel that nothing can atone for them.

Eddie woke in the middle of the night, Nov 7/8 , and wrote part of his dirge of Victory and finished it at the W.O. next day.

 

A Dirge Of Victory

Lift not thy trumpet, Victory, to the sky,
Nor through battalions nor by batteries blow,
But over hollows full of old wire go,
Where among dregs of war the long-dead lie
With wasted iron that the guns passed by.
When they went eastwards like a tide at flow;
There blow thy trumpet that the dead may know,
Who waited for thy coming, Victory.

It is not we that have deserved thy wreath,
They waited there among the towering weeds.
The deep mud burned under the thermite’s breath,
And winter cracked the bones that no man heeds:
Hundreds of nights flamed by: the seasons passed.
And thou last come to them at last, at last!

 

Don’t skim the sonnet! It’s very good, despite–or possibly because of–the formal diction. Dunsany, a fantasist with aestheticist leanings, is no Owen, and still less a Sassoon. He’s a disillusioned officer, but he’s also an Anglo-Irish baron, deeply invested in a particular strain of traditional literary culture in which the horns of Elfland sound louder than the trumpets of victory.

In this context, then, it’s striking how the sestet plays out: towering weeds, deep mud (and, yes, a rhyme, after that jarring thermite, that goes rather hard), and a refusal to look decently away and shroud the Dead Marshes in mist and mystery. No, the men who were lost in the waste do not rest in their unmarked graves: they are burned by man-made fire and cracked into pieces by nature’s indifference.

It’s as close to Hardy as Dunsany might come.

Lady Dunsany’s second diary for today, a century back, is in a very different register. But the story she tells is perhaps more powerful.

Evening

Bells ringing…

…I travelled by train… (news not official yet) and there was a private soldier in the carriage wild with excitement, and telling us all what he’d do when the news came. ‘I have a bottle of 3-star at home–I shan’t stop to draw the cork, I’ll knock the neck off, I’ll have a week’s leave and if they don’t give it to me I’ll take it.’ Then, with a sudden jerk, ‘there’ll be aching hearts today–my old mother for one–I am only one left out of five.’ Somehow his jumbled confidences were so like what everyone felt.[5]

 

References and Footnotes

  1. Zilboorg, Richard Aldington and H.D., 133.
  2. Talking Across the World, 339.
  3. The Dunsanys are ancient: thirty-eight and forty.
  4. A little too advanced, still: negotiations will continue into the morning of the 11th itself, but this news that the Germans are essentially ready to down arms is accurate.
  5. Amory, Lord Dunsany, 153-4.

Vivian de Sola Pinto is Overtaken by the Old World; One More Letter from Kate Luard; C.E. Montague and Rowland Feilding in Tournai; Olaf Stapledon Has One Word for Agnes; Ralph Mottram’s Men Shrug at Victory

$
0
0

We’ll open today, a century back, with our farthest-forward writer. But even the eager Vivian de Sola Pinto is no longer out in front of the entire B.E.F. It’s all coming together, now, as the negotiations for an armistice are concluding. There was desultory fighting during the day and more assaults are planned for tomorrow, but there will be no eve-of-the-end tragedy for any of our writers.

On the evening of 10th November the Divisional General passed us in his car on the road and shouted that the armistice has been signed. Later that evening a cavalry regiment overtook us. It was the 2nd Dragoon Guards, who were supposed to be our ‘cavalry screen’, but had only just caught us up! They were greeted with ribald shouts from the infantry.[1]

This is still slightly premature, not to mention the fact that armistice provided for continued violence up until the hour of its taking effect. So let that be the last stroke on behalf of those in the B.E.F. who have suffered the most–the fighting infantry. It’s almost too appropriate that a line battalion should be overtaken on the literal eve of victory by staff officers in a big car and an aristocrat-led cavalry division…

 

We bid farewell to Kate Luard back in the summertime, when her published letters petered out, although I did reserve the hope that we might one day hear more. And so we shall!

Kate Luard’s letter of today, a century back. Essex Record Office (D/DLu 55/13/1), with thanks to Caroline Stevens

Caroline Stevens recently sent me a photograph (and transcription!) of a letter of today, a century back, found in the Essex Record Office. The letter was written from a base hospital in France to two of Kate’s sisters, after which it would have been circulated among other members of their large family.

As always, Sister Luard’s letter includes both a closely-observed scene and her own sharp commentary on the war. and this letter provides us with a terrible segue, too: the war may be ending, but the influenza epidemic is only now reaching its full strength. Kate Luard’s nineteen-year-old niece Joan–the daughter of Frank Luard, killed at Gallipoli in 1915–has just died, apparently very soon after contracting the flu.

 

 Sunday night

Nov 10th

Dear G & N – you have given me the details about Oxford that I was wanting to know – but Ellie must tell me all the heavenly and funny things Joan said one day. Rose’s letter today of her friend who died the day they found it out shows what a treacherous illness it is: just the same happens to me here – while I am writing to the mother to say he is seriously ill, a slip comes from the Ward to say he is dead.  And I don’t think any doctoring or nursing has the slightest effect in this virulent pneumonia…

The delirium is one of the most difficult parts when you are short of staff.  I stopped one dying Sergt who was getting out of bed with nothing but a pyjama jacket on, because he wanted to get to his men. “No officers?” he kept saying. “Are there no officers? then I must take charge.”

…None of us have ever seen it before in this virulent epidemic form & the mortality is extraordinarily depressing. In one ward 17 out of 21 died in a few days – Everyone in the influenza wards has to wear a gauze mask & we make a point of off duty time for them – So far only 1 Sister & 2 VADs + three orderlies have gone sick with it and they are not pneumonic, several Sisters & 1 VAD have died at the Sick Sisters Hospital…

Now Sister Luard, one of the true veterans of the war, with more time in France than entire platoons of war poets, looks back on what they have all endured. Her patriotism never bottoms out, and her energy and compassion are never exhausted. She is experiencing, naturally, a certain cautious disbelief.

About the War, is this really the last night…?

Is tomorrow morning the last time of ‘standing to’,  & listening posts, & firesteps, & swimming canals under machine-gun fire & Zero hours & fractured femurs & smashed jaws & mustard gas & the crash of bombs and all the strange doings of the past 4 years?

It is quite impossible for a war-soaked brain like mine to think in terms of peace: war has come to be natural–peace unnatural…

Unlike either the vicious jingoists who are salivating at the chance to punish the German people for their leaders’ failed militarism or the hopeful internationalists who are worrying about how to secure a just peace rather than a cycle of vengeance, Luard is thinking about the immediate problems of the German people. She has nursed scores of shattered German boys (she discusses yet another one in another section of today’s letter) and she recognizes that their predicament, so similar to those who “sacrificed” themselves for the Allied cause, is in fact worse:

What I feel nervous about is who’s going to be responsible for carrying out our terms if they accept them, now they’ve booted out William… & everyone who has ever run the ship of state?

…All these awakening octogenarians [?] must feel such dupes & fools to have bootlicked the Hohenszollern inflation so long. The brave ones who have died ‘for the fatherland’ will never know that it wasn’t for the Fatherland at all – as far as victory goes…

She’s right, of course: once Germany is punished by the treaty terms, and especially after economic disaster follows, there will be plenty of blame to go around and little political will to resist a horrific reaction to this combination of defeat and perceived betrayal.

But this is not the note that Luard chooses to end what is surely her last letter of the war. Strangely–to my disenchanted eyes, at least–since her compassion for human suffering was so boundless and unflagging, Sister Luard never entirely relinquished her traditional view of war’s merits.

In a way it seems almost a bigger change from War to Peace than it was from Peace to War, perhaps because there was nothing very glorious about our last ten years of peace and everything about our 4 years of War has been very glorious.

Goodnight, love to Father, KEL

1000 thanks for all your letters

 

The sentiment of the post-script, at least, I can borrow and amplify as best I can. I want to extend 1000–actually, just over 1600–thanks for all your letters, both to those long gone who wrote home during the war (though not for me) and to all of those since who have researched, transcribed, edited, or published those letters (and diaries, and memoirs) so that latter-day historians, writers, and interested civilians could enjoy and make use of them. (This is that moment just before the end of the broadcast when the disembodied voice begins reading out collective thanks…)

My particular thanks, today, go to Kate Luard’s great-niece, Caroline Stevens, and to her great-nephew Tim Luard, for all they have done to bring attention to one of the war’s most fascinating personal chronicles. Caroline tells me that Tim will be speaking about his great-aunt’s letters at the Essex Record Office’s Armistice Day event–this very afternoon between noon and 3:30. Furthermore, extracts from the letters will be read at a Remembrance Concert at Chelmsford Cathedral at 7:30 (also featuring the music of Ivor Gurney‘s friend Herbert Howells). I’m glad to know that more people will shortly come to know the Kate Luard’s letters.

 

While on the subject of thanksgiving and Cathedral commemorations, let’s hear briefly from one of several of our writers who have converged on Tournai, today, a century back. C.E. Montague‘s published diary entries do not (I believe), mention Charles Scott Moncrieff (nor vice-versa) but they are now in the same city doing more or less the same job. Just a month ago, it was Moncrieff who had charge of the war correspondent Beach Thomas, and now it is Montague.

Nov. 10.—With Nevinson and Beach Thomas to Tournai, captured by us yesterday[2] and everyone radiant. Civilians in streets shake hands and say ‘Merci…’ A battalion of Black Watch march through the town with their pipes playing and crowds cheering. In the Cathedral a great service is going on, with the Bishop on his throne.[3]

 

Also in Tournai is Rowland Feilding–though not without a highly uncharacteristic show of defiant flair, here at the end.

At 7.15 this morning the battalion marched forward again. I had a slight fever and slept till about nine o’clock. Captain Kilner, one of my Company Commanders, who had been to Lille to take our contribution to the forty-four nuns, returned during the morning, and he and I rode forward to rejoin the battalion.

The battalion, according to orders, had marched round Tournai to the north, avoiding the town. To save time, Kilner and I decided to ride through it. I don’t mind also saying that we had a desire to see Tournai.

Co. Feilding is, however, stopped by a sentry, who is backed by an officer in insisting that they, despite their rank, must have “passes,” since their brigade is not slated to garrison the town. Feilding decides that it is not worth the time and trouble to go and fetch them… and then he makes a most uncharacteristic move.

…it happened that a company of machine-gunners was passing into the town. Thought I to myself, “Why should we be obliged to have passes, and on what grounds should the brigade that garrisons this town put it out of bounds to other troops and so keep all the fun to themselves? So Kilner and I joined on to the passing company, and entered Tournai as machine-gunners.

Being Sunday, all the people were in the streets and squares, dressed in their best clothes, and they gave us a great reception. Compared to this, we were comparatively unwanted when we marched through Lille… Charming ladies and children squandered flags and flowers upon us. We could have collected enough to stock a shop.[4]

 

Olaf Stapledon, who has recently been uncharacteristically preoccupied with practicalities, had news of the armistice this morning. But by the time he put pen to paper, he could hardly form sentences, so great was his happiness and his anticipation. The end of the war means no more suffering, no more killing, no more parsing of what a decent man owes to his country and to his conscience as the war machine grinds on–but it mostly means no more travel restrictions, and no more obstacles to love.

Vive I’armistice!

The telegram came through in English to this little French town, and one of us had to go to the post office and translate it. Personally I was taking a morning chauf-pieds along the canal when I met an elated artilleur who said, “C’est fini, la guerre.”

—“Mais, c’est dans la communique?”

—“Oui.”

—“Bon.”

We are taking a holiday from car repairs etc. to celebrate it. Oh praise the lord for Peace!

Come to England soon, Agnes mine. I am all impatience. I can wait not a moment longer than is absolutely necessary. Come, come, come.

Agnes, come to Olaf,

COME.[5]

 

Wouldn’t that be a lovely note to end on, this penultimate day? But I’m not about to start making sensible editorial decisions now. I want to end, instead, with a scene from a novel–a novel that sprawls over the entire war, but does today, a century back, very nicely indeed.

I regret never really having found a way to work Ralph Mottram‘s calm, humane, atmospheric, and intelligent The Spanish Farm Trilogy into this project. It’s an important treatment of life in the army’s middle ranks and middle jobs–the officers who do the inevitable mediation and paper work and are neither rear-echelon you-know-whats nor martinets manqué nor thieves nor utter incompetents. But Mottram didn’t put in enough dates, and the plot and characters and thrice-repeated story do not reduce well to summary. I hope, though, that today’s quotation will work nevertheless.

Skene, the English protagonist of the book, is neither killed nor mutilated nor ruined by the war. He’s not prone to operatic despair or utter self-absorption. But he’s having a hard time, tonight, a century back, even though his frustrating and unheroic work as a Corps-level middle manager has at last come to an end. (Skene’s good French and his experience as a banker make him too valuable as an administrator and mediator with the local population to be allowed to do other, less frustrating work.)

We begin with a liberation scene much like the ones enjoyed so much by Rowland Feilding, now transformed into a lighthearted optimist. But Skene can’t enjoy it in the same way: he hears the victory not as a triumphant fanfare, but as a series of diminished chords fading into an uncertain future.

The Umpteenth Corps did not share the Allied entry into Lille. Instead they had an entry of their own into a Flemish manufacturing town, with a core of old market-place, cathedral and town hall, and an old bridge with dropsical flanking towers, surrounded by a rind of new red-brick suburbs. For a moment the old enthusiasm flared up. Flemish mechanics and shop-keepers and womenfolk, who had heard but never seen the English soldiers fighting for them all these four years, suddenly saw in their own streets khaki and tin helmets, and a young officer of the Intelligence collecting municipal officials. Sober twentieth-century people, from offices and shops, wearing the shawls of mill-hands, the bowlers and black coats of a laborious life, danced, shouted, wept and wrung the hands of officers and men. Ladies with every appearance of invincible propriety kissed perspiring R.E.S putting up the bridges the Bosche had destroyed, and dragged out materials for their work from unsuspected hiding-places.

Skene, borrowed by Intelligence to help straighten things out, sat in the magnificent “Salle des Chevaliers” of the Town Hall, interrogating and docketing batches of Bosche prisoners. When he came out he was set on by troops of children who clung all over him, demanding to be kissed, and would soon have left him buttonless in their thirst for souvenirs. Struggling to his billet in the front room of a miner’s cottage, he sat with Uncle over a bottle of whisky, waiting for news of the Armistice terms that had been sent to the Bosche. It was the evening of November the tenth.

The field telephone stood on the treadle sewing machine in the window. Corps Signals had been duly bribed.

The man of the house came in from work, and passed by them, with doffed cap, to the back kitchen where his family were collected round the stove.

“Have ye explained to him about the billeting?” said Uncle, doctrinaire in his cups.

Skene called the man back. The Frenchman protested. It was payment enough to have English in the house: but his wife struck in. It was too good, no doubt, but acceptable. “Give ’im a drink!” said Uncle.

Man, wife, old aunt, and little daughter Simone all came, and from liqueur glasses drank “to our deliverers” with tears and smiles, partly joy, partly unaccustomed whisky.

In the pitiful bare respectability of the little room, a cheap clock ticked, Uncle snored; Skene sat with his hand on the field telephone.

Before his tired eyes came faces from the great training camps, peopled by happy boys, now dust and decay in any corner from Dunkirk to Baghdad — visions of fine light-hearted mornings, or wet benumbing twilight in Bailleul and Villers Brettonneux, of which no stone now rested on another — visions of the waste of No Man’s Land, in the dreary machine-gun-punctuated dawn, of Christmas dinners in the Officers’ Restaurant at Amiens, when a hundred and fifty officers from all corners of the world with hands crossed sang “Auld Lang Syne” — visions of all that great cataclysm which had turned the ease-loving, sport-following manhood of England into the New Armies — turned the New Armies into Armed and Fighting England stretching through France and Italy, half across Asia and the oceans of the world — the cataclysm which had caught him, Skene, like a straw, whirled him out of the quiet certainty of his office life in the Close of an English cathedral town — bumped him against this and that until he had become a person unrecognizable to himself, with all the landmarks of his existence changed; caught him too against Madeleine and wrenched the heart out of him.

The telephone bell buzzed. He took up the receiver.

“Umpteenth Corps Clearance Officer!”

“Speaking! Who are you?”

“Corps Signals. Is that Mr. Skene?”

“Speaking!”

“We’ve just intercepted Bosche wireless, sir. They are going to sign in the morning!”

“Thanks! Good night!”

Reaching over the little table, he shook Uncle. The old man opened his eyes, owl-like, and sat up.

“They’re going to sign!”

“Who? — what? — oh! the Bosche!”

The old man looked at Skene and then away.

“Well, that’s the end of it then!” he said.

“That’s the end of it!” repeated Skene.

And suddenly he could not look at Uncle. He could only struggle with an emotion not admissible in an officer. The end of it! This little mean room, in a Flemish slum! The laconic printed “Order” that would appear on the morrow. Victory!

Rounds! He went outside into the chill and darkness of that November night. At the small factory where his men were billeted, he found his sentry; in the little pay-office, his superior New Army Corporal, reading a paper-covered novel over a brazier; — beyond, in the low sheds where his men were sleeping, his mules tied up and his carts stacked, all was in darkness and silence. “Celebrations!” he thought. Emerging again into the little paved street, he met what to him was typical of war as he had waged it. In the lampless glimmer of the night, a string of square boxes on wheels, known as limbers, was being drawn with a springless rattle over the pavé, by weary mules, beside whom were men just sufficiently awake to guide them. At the head a muffled figure, for all the world like the leader of some North Pole Expedition, was plodding beside a somnambulistic horse.

Abreast of Skene he muttered: “This’ll get me to Werlies, I s’pose! Is it true they’ve chucked it?”

Skene nodded. “I believe the Bosche are going to sign the Armistice terms in the morning!”

“Good job. We should have chucked it, if they hadn’t!”

And he stumped on.

Skene pulled off his boots and got into his blankets. “Too long,” he thought. “Who cares now?”

He had forgotten that this was Victory.[6]

 

References and Footnotes

  1. The City that Shone, 243.
  2. Vivian de Sola Pinto would disagree with this dating, however...
  3. Elton, C.E. Montague, 225.
  4. War Letters to a Wife, 351.
  5. Talking Across the World, 339-40.
  6. The Spanish Farm Trilogy, 531-35.

The Great Calm

$
0
0

At 5 A.M., the representatives of Germany signed the Armistice that had been under negotiation for four days. At 11:00, it took effect, and the war ended, almost exactly a week after Wilfred Owen was killed.

At noon on November 11 the Armistice bells had been pealing for an hour in Shrewsbury when the telegram arrived at his parents’ house.[1]

That, at least, is how I first read the story. Now I realize, rather belatedly, that I’m not sure where Paul Fussell got this account of the exact timing, this hour’s space of grace before the blow fell. The telegram did arrive at some point today, a century back, telling Susan Owen the her favorite son was dead, or so she would always remember it. But when, exactly? And did Harold Owen really see his brother’s shade in his shipboard cabin at the moment of the armistice? I don’t know–but we’re out of the war now, and into the telling of it.

 

There are so many facts, so much evidence, so many written records and so much artistic expression that speaks to the experience of the war. There’s so much history. But no definitive History, and no tale can be told straight and plain afterwards, not without the frame of the war, beginning to end; without the filter of the tellers’ lives between the experience and the writing; without the coloring added by readers’ own experiences; without the attrition and distortions of memory.

None of which makes our reading (and writing) any less worth the doing. What would be worth doing, really, if not re-telling the stories that show us how we have lived, and might live?[2]

But this can be hard to see on a day like today, when we–and they, a century back–are thinking so much of those who have died. Can they remember them as they were, or only as they are now, part of this dreadful story? Can we know their lives as experiences once open to possibility, rather than as arcs visible in their entirety?

This is one challenge that has defined this project since the summer of ’14: knowing the ending. Knowing, as many of you did, that one of the best poets would die so late, and that his mother would suffer the cruelest possible ironic blow at the very end. But exciting as it was to propose and carry out the experiment of wilful historical possibility–of living on the day, a century back, and trying not to know the “future”–on this last day it feels, perhaps not surprisingly, that there is very little left to do. To carry on is dispiriting, not least because there are entire shelves of books written about this one particular day. Some of these focus, as Fussell did, on the irony, on the cruelness of the war and the physical and emotional destruction and exhaustion it left in its wake. Others detail the celebrations in London and Paris, or write in anger about the cynical last few hours of violence (hundreds of men were killed today, in pointless up-to-the-minute fighting, but only one of our writers was actually under fire) or the grim future that the Armistice gave birth to: a Germany that didn’t understand its own defeat, punitive allied terms, the birth of the “stab in the back” myth and the seeds of a war that will dwarf the sufferings of this one. So I want, mostly, to think about Susan Owen, and to rest from my scrivener’s labors…

Yet it would be a strange little irony to go short-and-bitter after so many conscientiously exhaustive episodes, and it would be unfair to our writers to leave so many stories without their final tableaux. So, bear with me one more time, for one long last post. There will be a number of shorter excerpts describing Armistice Day experiences, a few passages from the most important contemporary novels of the war, longer pieces from Vera Brittain and Osbert Sitwell, a last note on the future of A Century Back, and a poem at the very end.

 

So, to the soldiers. Of all of our informants, Vivian de Sola Pinto had perhaps the liveliest Armistice Day.

On the morning of the 11th we were still being shelled and machine-gunner occasionally by German rear-guards and one of our captains was killed by a direct hit on a latrine.

It’s too brutal for a cheap joke. Their triumphal entry into a Belgian village has a suitably surreal air to it:

Soon after, as we approached the outskirts of the village, we were met by a crowd of peasants, headed by a little hunchback with an accordion who led us in triumph into Perquise, playing the Marseillaise.[3]

 

Frank Richards of the 2nd Royal Welch nearly witnessed a similar last chance killing–horrifying and infuriating considering that the armistice had been signed, and yet, for an old soldier, just another twist of fate, one more shell on one more day of the long war.

On the morning of November 11th, just before we left the house we were staying in, a small enemy shell crashed through the roof, but nobody was hit. We advanced about a mile out of the village and were halted behind some banks. On the right of us on the road was a cooker which had been badly knocked about, and laying alongside of it were the two dead cooks of another battalion in the Division. One of the last shells that the enemy had fired on this part of the Front had burst by them as they were moving along the road that morning…

With the exception of some men of the transport there were not more than two or three of us left that had seen it through since the commencement, and ours was supposed to be a lucky battalion. I expect we had pulled off a twenty-thousand-to-one chance.

There being nothing to drink in this particular village, Richards promptly sat down to gamble, and lost many months of pay in a few hours. He’s probably right on the odds, and philosophically accepts the fact that only now his luck has changed at last: easy come, easy go.[4]

 

Richards is a canny old Regular and penniless former coal miner from South Wales. Alfred Hale, musical gentleman of means and hapless babe-in-the-woods of soldiering, is probably the least similar private soldier in the entire B.E.F.  So he responded rather less decisively:

I see I have written in my Diary the single word ‘(Peace?)’ thus, in brackets. Anyhow, from that day the guns ceased to rumble in the near distance… I don’t think I, personally, knew for certain what had happened till Saturday night the 16th, since my Times arrived somewhat spasmodically…[5]

 

But all the guns are not quiet yet–or won’t be until the stroke of 11:00. John Buchan will report a strange little scene opposite the South African Brigade, a last glimpse of the war as a performance. At least there were no casualties (apparently) as a result of this particular last-minute hate-show.

A German machine-gunner, after firing off a belt without pause, was seen to stand up beside his weapon, bow, and then walk slowly to the rear…[6]

 

C.E. Montague was not far away from Vivian de Sola Pinto, and he managed to find a suitable way of bringing the war full-circle–geographically, at least.

…with all speed we go through Valenciennes towards Mons… we motor into Mons at 11 to the moment… The only
German we see as we go into Mons is a dead one lying under the Boulevard trees… In the square troops of the
3rd Can. Div. are drawn up in mass before the Town Hall. The G.O.C. comes in, stands up in his car, and orders caps off and three cheers for King Albert, and we give him four… One of the General’s G.S.O. tells me the enemy left Mons in the night.

So, for the British, the war ends where it began; and, in being driven along the Rouen-Brussels road from Mons to Albert, and fighting back along it to Mons, the Allies have broken Prussianism and saved the world. Back through Valenciennes to Lille. On coming in I write my application to relinquish my commission and to have leave pending retirement.[7]

 

We will hear from Montague again, in fiction, below, but we’ll go now to his colleague, Charles Moncrieff, who is now supervising photographers and film crews on the scene with B.E.F. headquarters, which is now in Cambrai:

Sir Douglas Haig and the Army Commanders met in conference, duly photographed and filmed by two of my men, a historic scene, a small knot of troops outside, motor drivers, etc. When the Chief came out they suddenly gave a ringing cheer, which you will see in the film by the row of opening mouths. After lunch, the same day, the Prince of Wales slipped up very quietly in an open car to congratulate the Chief on winning the war. To-day’s excitement is the repatriés, who are beginning to come through. There is much to do and so few of us to do it that I quite despair—and must stop now.[8]

This film appears to be in the collection of the Imperial War Museum, but not, alas, available online (nor is Moncrieff’s role noted). Just one more note for that diminished chord of long-serving soldiers in France and Belgium.

 

Guy Chapman‘s battalion was in the fighting of November 4th–they have, in fact, been in and out of combat for the last “hundred days,” one of the little groups that has been left to finish the job while others planned their celebrations.

On 11th November we marched back fifteen miles to Bethencourt. A blanket of fog covered the countryside. At eleven o’clock we slung on our packs and tramped on along the muddy pavé. The band played, but there was very little singing. ‘Before a man comes to be wise, he is half dead with Catarrhes and aches, with sore eyes, and a worn-out body.’ We were very old, very tired, and now very wise…

In an effort to cure our apathy, the little American doctor from Vermont who had joined us a fortnight earlier broke his invincible teetotalism, drank half a bottle of whisky, and danced a cachuca. We looked at his antics with dull eyes and at last put him to bed.[9]

 

It’s time, perhaps, to move back across the channel and begin looking at the celebrations in England.

The young infantryman Harry Patch was stationed at Golden Hill Fort, looking out over the Solent. Out on the firing range with other men training or re-training for France, Patch saw a rocket go up at 11:00.

I remember the feelings of joy to think that I would not have to go back and relief that the war was over…[10]

That night they had a wild party, and Patch was soon demobilized. He will live to see ninety more Armistice Days, but prefer to observe instead the day his own war ended in disaster and survival.

 

Edward Heron-Allen recovered from a bout of the flu just in time to return to work at the War Office this morning. His diary describes the famous celebrations in central London, giving pride of place to “a long procession of girls and boy clerks” cheering, waving, and improvising “confetti” from War Office “forms”–both still in scare quotes, a century back. But Heron-Allen himself, though no spring chicken, is fast off the mark with his own celebrations:

The moment the Order of the Day came round at 10am I secured tables at the Imperial for lunch and dinner, and it was as well I did, for they were turning people away by hundreds…

One got something now and then, but we were principally occupied standing up and singing… I never saw so many drunken people together before.[11]

 

Osbert Sitwell, looking back on the war from toward the end of what will be a lively career as a Modernist poet, writer, editor, and public pseudo-intellectual, writes the last day several times over in the early pages of one volume of his memoirs. We’ll take the second passage first:

No-one, then, who had not been a soldier, alive on the morning of the 11th of November 1918, can imagine the joy, the unexpected, startling joy of it… victory… flung itself on us. The news had been — or at any rate had seemed — beyond what could be believed: the only way of persuading oneself of its truth was by doing something one had never done before, such as dancing in Trafalgar Square. It was with this feeling, I think, that the units composing the crowd danced. . . .  When the news had first come with a ringing of bells and sounding of maroons, men and women, who had never seen one another before, spoke, to ask if it were true.

There’s something about that rather slight breach of social decorum that brings across the jarring strangeness of the day, no?

But Sitwell has also written the famous London celebrations as a Modernist “found art” spectacle. In this he captures the other half of a paradoxical bundle of feelings: that sense of being at a sudden, momentous ending. Here he anticipates the Larkin poem which will eventually be where we now so often begin:

And today — the 11th of November 1918 — that long present had suddenly become changed to past, clearly to be seen as such. Hence both the joy and the earnestness of dancers in street and square tonight: hence, too, the difficulty of finding a way in which to describe to the reader the movements that so precisely interpreted conflicting emotions: the long drawn-out misery and monastic stultification of the trenches, and then the joy of a victory that in the end had rushed on us with the speed and impact of a comet — for it was difficult, I realised that fully, as, with my companions, Diaghilev and Massine, I stopped to watch for a moment the shifting general pattern of the mass of people. With something of the importance of a public monument attaching to his scale and build, the great impresario, bear-like in his fur-coat, gazed with an air of melancholy exhaustion at the crowds. I do not know what thoughts were passing through his head. The dancer, on the other hand, so practical an artist, and in spite of the weighty tradition of his art, so vital in the manner in which he seizes his material from the life round him, was watching intently the steps and gestures of the couples, no doubt to see if any gifts to Terpsichore could be wrung from them…

As for myself, when I looked at the couples — and a few who were dancing by themselves! — I felt lonely, as always in a throng. My thoughts turned inwards, and to other occasions. It was curious that now that the battle was over and the Captains and the Kings had become dead leaves overnight, rattling down from their trees, whirling head over heels in the air, my mind, which had so perpetually during the course of it avoided thoughts of war… did not busy itself with the future, enticing as that seemed to all of us, but reverted ever to two scenes.

First to the landscape of an early September morning, where the pale golden grasses held just the colour of a harvest moon, as they shone under the strong, misty sun of autumn in northern France; a wide flatness of gentle, tawny land, where dead bodies in khaki and field-grey lay stiff and glittering in the heavy dew, among the blue clouds of the chicory flowers, which reflected the sky and, as it were, pinned it down…

Such a morning, I would have hazarded, as that on which men, crowned with the vast hemicycles of their gold helmets, clashed swords at Mycenae, or outside the towers of Troy, only to be carried from the field to lie entombed in air and silence for millenniums under their stiff masks of thin virgin gold: (how far had we descended, crawling now, earth-coloured as grubs, among the broken stumps of trees, and the barbed wire, until we were still, among the maggoty confusion, and our faces took on the tints of the autumn earth and the rusty discoloration of dry blood!).

Then the alternate scene switched before me: No-Man’s-Land, that narrow strip of territory peculiar to the First World War; the very dominion of King Death; where his palace was concealed, labyrinthine in its dark corridors, mysterious in its distances, so that sometimes those who sought him spent hours, whole days, a week even, in the antichambers that led to his presence, and lay lost in the alleys and mazes of barbed wire. Throughout the length of time that the sun takes, you could hear their groans and sighs, and could not reach them. . . . All that was over, for everyone. No wonder that the world rejoiced at a cessation that seemed more splendid than many a thing won![12]

 

Herbert Read surely would have preferred to be observing the throngs with his pal Osbert and the famous Russians whose work he has begun to love. But, alas, he is still stuck at a military camp in Kent, so he stayed in. It’s to be all Modernism from now on: Read and Sitwell have decided to edit Arts and Letters together, and just yesterday Read wrote to the War Office to cancel his request for a permanent commission. But today he is the army, and indoors. At least he gives us one last opportunity to peer over a soldier’s shoulder and see what he is reading:

Everybody went mad… I felt hopelessly sober. I read Henry James’s Sacred Fount to the accompaniment of the rejoicings—with a savage zest.[13]

 

Sitwell’s other surviving new friend, Siegfried Sassoon, was similarly preoccupied. But, writing tonight in his diary, he is much more succinct than Sitwell and, as is his way, more blatantly adversarial.

November 11

I was walking in the water-meadows by the river below Cuddesdon this morning—a quiet grey day. A jolly peal of bells was ringing from the village-church, and the villagers were hanging little flags out of the windows of their thatched houses. The war is ended. It is impossible to realise…

I got to London about 6.30 and found masses of people: in streets and congested Tubes, all waving flags and making fools of themselves—an outburst of mob patriotism. It was a wretched wet night, and very mild. It is a loathsome ending to the loathsome tragedy of the last four years.[14]

 

Duff Cooper made a very similar progress from the countrysie–he has been at a weekend shooting party in Norfolk–to a London that seems, suddenly, a very bad place to be for those who feel their losses heavily.

November 11, 1918

We left by train at about 11. Two Flying Corps officers got in at Cambridge and said they had received an official wireless to say that the armistice had been signed. As we got nearer London we saw flags flying and in some places cheering crowds… In spite of real delight I couldn’t resist a feeling of profound melancholy, looking at the crowds of silly cheering people and thinking of the dead… The streets were full of wild enthusiasm. Diana shared the melancholy with which these filled me–and once she broke down and sobbed.[15]

 

Dorothie Feilding‘s war–and its personally happy ending–has run a year or so ahead of Duff and Diana. She is married and safe, her husband back from the front and herself long finished with driving ambulances under fire. But she, too, thinks mostly of those who were lost, including her brother. She will write to her mother tomorrow, and sound–perhaps sincerely, perhaps for her mother’s benefit–the approved note of righteous solemnity.

I couldn’t bear to hear the people laughing & clapping yesterday. One was so haunted by the memories of those dear boys who have gone. But Mother dear thank God that supreme sacrifice was not for nothing as I have often feared it would be.[16]

 

Back to Belgium we go, now, with Dorothie’s distant cousin Rowland Feilding. He shares that sense of a sacrifice redeemed but with, perhaps, a caveat: it was worth it–but a more complete victory would have been worth more.

As we marched away the band played a tune well known to the men, who are accustomed to accompany it with the following words:

When this ruddy war is over,
Oh! how happy I shall be!

This, no doubt, was very appropriate, but nevertheless, what a thousand pities that we should have had to draw off at such a moment—-just as we had the enemy cold!

Perhaps, though not quite for the world-historical reasons he would adduce. But I would rather have our last glimpse of Fielding, perhaps our most steadfast correspondent from the front, looking forward to the rewards of peace. Four days ago, he wrote one of the last of his many hundreds of war letters to his wife Edith, the mother of their young daughters.

How strange it will be when the fighting stops. I am already beginning to look back upon the last 4 1/2 years as a sort of dream, in which there outstands a single tall figure in black;–always the last to have been seen by me when leaving for the war, and the first on coming home for leave. I will leave you to guess whose is that faithful, patient figure.[17]

 

Olaf Stapledon, too, has lived to love. Soon Agnes Miller will make the journey from Australia, and they will be married–is it the happiest who are most struck by a sense of disbelief?

Peace Day

My Olaf,

It is 5 minutes before midnight, but I must write just a line because this is such a great day… I can’t believe it is really the end of the war. The war seems like a whole life & I can’t believe that that life has come to its last day. What a tumult of thoughts must be rising tonight from all over the world—mostly of thankfulness that it is over & much rejoicing & alas! much sorrowing. Tomorrow we will begin a new chapter. . .[18]

 

“Chapter” will do for a segue… so, what about fiction? If so many of those who wrote their own war-lives stopped to take stock, today, a century back, and try to figure out how this day changed their feelings about all those that went before (and those that will come), how much more must a novelist struggle to take a long view, emplotting and implying meaning with a light yet accurate touch?

 

Ford Madox Hueffer, like his erstwhile temporary superior Herbert Read, was far from the celebrations in London. He is still stationed at Redcar, in Yorkshire, and will recall only a final day of bumf: “I remember Armistice Day very well… because I was kept so busy with military duties that I was on my feet all day until I fell into bed stone sober at 4 next morning.” But he, like other ardent lovers (never mind his legal wife and recent pseudo-wife, this letter is to Stella Bowen, his latest love) wrote first to the one he wants to be with:

Darling… Just a note to say I love you more than ever. Peace has come, & for some reason I feel inexpressibly sad. I suppose it is the breaking… after the old strain![19]

But despite this sadness–and this remoteness–Ford will go on to write perhaps the longest and most important fictional treatment of Armistice Day (and Armistice Night.) Most of the third volume of the Tietjens Tetralogy, A Man Could Stand Up takes place today, a century back, inside the consciousnesses of first Valentine Wannop, the Stella-Bowen like love interest, and then the distinctly Fordish Christopher Tietjens himself. Valentine walks away from her job as a gym teacher at a girl’s school and through the increasingly raucous celebrations, while Tietjens does his own wandering before eventually uniting with her. They will consummate their as-yet-chaste relationship tonight, but not before they receive a series of visitations from strange figures marked in different ways by the war… it’s very difficult to describe, not least because I read it several years ago now, but mostly because it is a bewildering High Modernist novel of consciousness. It’s a lot like Pynchon’s manic evocations of life in London toward the end of the next war, and very little like the long-nineteenth-century novels which also discuss the last days of this one.

 

Ralph Mottram‘s novel sees the war without much fuss at all. He’s already done it once, yesterday, with his protagonist’s final shrug, but in another volume of the multi-faceted work he circles back for one more bathetic stroke of bureaucratic nonsense, buck-passing, and general incompetence, all set in the larger context of casual destruction and deliberate cruelty which the fighting troops can often ignore, but those who have to confront displaced civilians cannot.

Not long after the armistice, an officer of middling talents named Dormer finds himself in possession of 140 prisoners. But there is no glory here, and even a bit of a sticky wicket:

In the little time-keeper’s box, turned into the company office, he found a tall, good-looking man, who immediately addressed him in perfect English, giving the rank of Feld Webel, the quantity and regiment of his party and adding: “I surrender to you, sir.” Dormer gave instructions that the party should be marched to Brigade Head-quarters. He wanted to send some report as to the capture, but his subordinate replied: “We didn’t capture ’em. They just marched up the street. The post at the bridge let ’em through.” Dormer let it go at that, and having seen the street cleared, he walked over to see his Colonel…

No one knows what to do with the prisoners, and eventually their dithering is “interrupted by noise outside, shouts and cries, the sound of marching, and orders given in German.” The indecisive British officers go outside to find their German prisoners surrounded by a French mob:

…to the number of some hundreds, mostly people of over military age, or children, but one and all with those thin white faces that showed the long years of insufficient and unsuitable food, and the spiritual oppression that lay on “occupied” territory. They were shouting and shaking their fists round the compact formation of Dormer’s prisoners, who had just been halted, in front of the house. The N.C.O. in charge had been ordered by Brigade to bring them back. A chit explained the matter: “Prisoners taken after 11.00 a.m. to be sent back to their own units, on the line of retreat.”

The Feld Webel enlightened the Colonel’s mystification: “We refuse to obey the order, sir. Our regiment is twenty miles away. All the peasants have arms concealed. We shall just be shot down.”

It was a dilemma. Dormer could not help thinking how much better the Feld Webel showed up, than his own Colonel. The latter could not shoot the men where they stood. Nor could he leave them to the mercies of the natives. How difficult War became with the burden of civilization clogging its heels… [20]

Indeed. The officers fall back upon their strengths, however, and simply waste time until the mob disperses and lorries arrive to transport the Germans into someone else’s sphere of responsibility…

 

Henry WIlliamson marks the day as one more bleak mood in the long up-and-down of Phillip Maddison’s agonizing bildung.

It was over. It was ended. He sat in his bedroom of 9 Manor Terrace, at non on 11th November, and mourned alone, possessed by vacancy that soon the faces of the living would join those of the dead, and be known no more.[21]

But Maddison–still, incredibly, a callow youth, even after four years of war and as many volumes of his Chronicle–manages to drag himself through the forced revelry that follows…

 

C.E. Montague is the only one of these coming novelists to give his own experiences of precisely today, a century back (on which see above), to one of his characters. Auberon, the hero of Rough Justice, is everything a good middle class Georgian boy should be. He is kind, athletic, sporting, lovable, honorable, and neither dull nor terribly clever. His terribly clever friend came to an awful end, and their less honorable fellow-traveler suffered the indignity of being heavily decorated for desultory staff-work, but Auberon, though he loses an arm, will get the girl. In the meantime, he, like his creator, is minding journalists in Mons, where he comes across the body of a dead German sniper.

Montague loves Auberon, because he’s a good boy, but he neither spares him maiming nor allows him any last flash of understanding: he may represent much that is good about the old Public School outlook, but that also means that he is unequipped to comprehend the squalor of the war’s ending.

The war’s last morning brought him with our leading troops into the little grimy town of Mons where, for England’s armies, the war had begun. It struck eleven on a little tinkling church clock in the square, and the British soldiers and the people of the town shook hands and cheered and tasted all they could of the fulfilment of the deep desire that had moved them for more than four years. A German sniper, killed a few hours ago while covering the retreat of his friends, lay under a tree with his hundreds of used cartridge-cases scattered round him. He looked lonely amidst all the rejoicings at the defeat of the cause for which he had been, perhaps, the last man to die. Like many of the dead in war, he had a drowsy, troubled look, as if he had wondered, while dying, “Why has this overtaken me?”

Auberon wanted to do what an English private will do in the ring when he has beaten a plucky opponent at last — put his arm round the stout loser’s neck and say, “Good lad!” Why should war be the only ring void of sportsmanship? And yet this morning’s General Order to cease firing at eleven included a clause forbidding fraternisation. Oh, it was all very difficult.[22]

 

Just as it was always very difficult to work these carefully shaped and rarely dated novels into the fabric of this project. (Of course it was! But still, I had hopes…) With fiction concluded, I want to close with a memoir–Vera Brittain‘s Testament of Youth, as it must be–and then, finally, a poem.

Now that the war is over, many of the young survivors will go to school, take up professions, and generally find ways to put the war behind them, nevertheless knowing that they will one day want sit down and write about it. Their two greatest motivations to do so were surely either to unburden themselves of their own experiences or to remember and memorialize those who died. Vera Brittain will return to Oxford, begin her writing career as a novelist, get married, and start a family. But the memoir was coming, and when it did it proved to be the one that could best do both: she tells the story of her own growth from “provincial young-ladyhood” to university student to V.A.D. nurse to veteran of emergency nursing in overseas hospitals, but her story is never just hers–it’s a quintet, containing a four-part threnody, the major parts assigned to her fiancé Roland Leighton and her brother Edward and the minor ones to their friends and hers, Victor Richardson and Geoffrey Thurlow.

The beauty of her memoir is in the writing, and the pathos earned through the binary vision of retrospection, by which the story comes across in two registers: the experienced woman looking back at the self-centered, dramatic youth running eagerly toward such terrible sorrows. And although many men wrote, and wrote well, of the friends they lost, it’s surely true that Brittain’s book derives from her unusual position at a time when gender roles were only just beginning to change. In a traditional way, she takes up the task of mourning and remembrance, as a sister and near-widow of the “fallen;” and yet she was there, under the bombs at Étaples, learning to handle shattered minds and bodies every day, and she writes as a then-rare female veteran. But the fact that she was able to write an extended elegy at the same time as a Bildungsroman-like memoir (which replaces, in many ways, the first novel, a roman à clef she will abandon) is a testament to her skill as a writer, just barely able to master the emotions of memory and tell a true, affecting story.

Enough commentary! What I means is this: Brittain does a better job than all the others of being there both for herself and for the dead.

When the sound of victorious guns burst over London at 11 a.m. on November 11th, 1918, the men and women who looked incredulously into each other’s faces did not cry jubilantly: “We’ve won the War!” They only said: “The War is over.” From Millbank I heard the maroons crash with terrifying clearness, and, like a sleeper who is determined to go on dreaming after being told to wake up, I went on automatically washing the dressing bowls in the annex outside my hut…

And as I dried the bowls I thought: “It’s come too late for me… Why couldn’t it have ended rationally, as it might have ended, in 1916, instead of all that trumpet-blowing against a negotiated peace, and the ferocious talk of secure civilians about marching to Berlin? It’s come five months too late — or is it three years? It might have ended last June, and let Edward, at least, be saved! Only five months — it’s such a little time, when Roland died nearly three years ago.”

But on Armistice Day not even a lonely survivor drowning in black waves of memory could be left alone with her thoughts. A moment after the guns had subsided into sudden, palpitating silence, the other V.A.D. from my ward dashed excitedly into the annex.

“Brittain! Brittain! Did you hear the maroons? It’s over — it’s all over! Do let’s come out and see what’s happening!”

There is time yet for one more cruel twist of fate, one more toss of crass casualty.

Mechanically I followed her into the road. As I stood there, stupidly rigid, long after the triumphant explosions from Westminster had turned into a distant crescendo of shouting, I saw a taxicab turn swiftly in from the Embankment towards the hospital. The next moment there was a cry for doctors and nurses from passers-by, for in rounding the comer the taxi had knocked down a small elderly woman who in listening, like myself, to the wild noise of a world released from nightmare, had failed to observe its approach. As I hurried to her side I realised that she was all but dead and already past speech. Like Victor in the mortuary chapel, she seemed to have shrunk to the dimensions of a child with the sharp features of age, but on the tiny chalk-white face an expression of shocked surprise still lingered, and she stared hard at me as Geoffrey had stared at his orderly in those last moments of conscious silence beside the Scarpe. Had she been thinking, I wondered, when the taxi struck her, of her sons at the front, now safe?

…I remembered her at intervals throughout that afternoon, during which, with a half-masochistic notion of “seeing the sights ” I made a circular tour to Kensington by way of the intoxicated West End. With aching persistence my thoughts went back to the dead and the strange irony of their fates — to Roland, gifted, ardent, ambitious, who had died without glory in the conscientious performance of a routine job; to Victor and Geoffrey, gentle and diffident, who, conquering nature by resolution, had each gone down bravely in a big “show”; and finally to Edward, musical, serene, a lover of peace, who had fought courageously through so many battles and at last had been killed while leading a vital counter-attack in one of the few decisive actions of the War…

Late that evening, when supper was over, a group of elated V.A.D.s who were anxious to walk through Westminster and Whitehall to Buckingham Palace prevailed upon me to join them. Outside the Admiralty a crazy group of convalescent Tommies were collecting specimens of different uniforms and bundling their wearers into flag-strewn taxis; with a shout they seized two of my companions and disappeared into the clamorous crowd, waving flags and shaking rattles. Wherever we went a burst of enthusiastic cheering greeted our Red Cross uniform, and complete strangers adorned with wound stripes rushed up and shook me warmly by the hand. After the long, long blackness, it seemed like a fairy-tale to see the street lamps shining through the chill November gloom.

I detached myself from the others and walked slowly up Whitehall, with my heart sinking in a sudden cold dismay. Already this was a different world from the one that I had known during four life-long years, a world in which people would be light-hearted and forgetful, in which themselves and their careers and their amusements would blot out political ideals and great national issues. And in that brightly lit, alien world I should have no part. All those with whom I had really been intimate were gone; not one remained to share with me the heights and the depths of my memories. As the years went by and youth departed and remembrance grew dim, a deeper and ever deeper darkness would cover the young men who were once my contemporaries… The War was over; a new age was beginning; but the dead were dead and would never return.[23]

 

 

Finally, we’ll have Thomas Hardy end the project, as he began it.

But before I do I want to offer thanks to everyone who has helped out with corrections, clarifications, comments, new materials, or information on the veterans and writers in their families, or simply sent an encouraging message. This has been a strange experience, and I do hope still to use all of the reading and thinking about the war to write a book about the writing of the Great War–one that’s sufficiently different from all the good ones already out there. If and when I do so I will post updates here, if the site is still up, or let those of you with whom I’m in email contact know what’s happening. In fact, if you’d like to know about future projects, send an email to admin @ acenturyback.com so I can assemble a list…

But that’s all well in the future. What about tomorrow?

Tomorrow I am taking a day off.

After that, I will begin posting again at irregular and probably increasing intervals, beginning, if not on the 13th, then some day fairly soon. I’m not sure how long this will go on, but I would like–mindful of the risk of depression associated with too-abrupt demobilization!–to get to the end of some of these stories.

In many cases, I haven’t read the biographies or letters or journals any further than the armistice and would like, without time pressure, to learn what happened “après la guerre fini.” In other cases, I know something of the writer’s after-life and would like to think and write about how post-war experiences shaped both writers’ telling of their own stories and the ways in which those stories were read. So, perhaps, there will be a handful of posts–a few handfuls, at most–linked less to post-war dates than to particular writers. Some of the survivors and mourners will meet to offer consolation–and help with editing and publishing the work of the dead. There are pieces to pick up, ways to move forward forward.

It will be something, after all of this, to read of lives conducted in peace, without paying the “tax of quick alarm,” without suffering spasms of terror at the sound of the telegraph-boy’s bicycle, without wondering if the foolishness or incompetence of those in power are likely to kill you tomorrow. There are long-delayed marriages to celebrate, and children to be born and raised and loved, books to be written and art to be made.

Of course that will be only part of the story: there is enduring trauma, too, and madness and despair, and lives that will never recover from loss. And when the wind sown this morning, a century back, whips up into the whirling fury of a much worse war, it will carry off some of those children. But for now, today, a century back, it’s over.

 

And There Was a Great Calm

(On the Signing of the Armistice, 11 Nov. 1918)

 

                                       I
There had been years of Passion—scorching, cold,
And much Despair, and Anger heaving high,
Care whitely watching, Sorrows manifold,
Among the young, among the weak and old,
And the pensive Spirit of Pity whispered, “Why?”

 

                                       II
Men had not paused to answer. Foes distraught
Pierced the thinned peoples in a brute-like blindness,
Philosophies that sages long had taught,
And Selflessness, were as an unknown thought,
And “Hell!” and “Shell!” were yapped at Lovingkindness.

 

                                       III
The feeble folk at home had grown full-used
To ‘dug-outs’, ‘snipers’, ‘Huns’, from the war-adept
In the mornings heard, and at evetides perused;
To day-dreamt men in millions, when they mused—
To nightmare-men in millions when they slept.

 

                                       IV
Waking to wish existence timeless, null,
Sirius they watched above where armies fell;
He seemed to check his flapping when, in the lull
Of night a boom came thencewise, like the dull
Plunge of a stone dropped into some deep well.

 

                                       V
So, when old hopes that earth was bettering slowly
Were dead and damned, there sounded ‘War is done!’
One morrow. Said the bereft, and meek, and lowly,
‘Will men some day be given to grace? yea, wholly,
And in good sooth, as our dreams used to run?’

 

                                       VI
Breathless they paused. Out there men raised their glance
To where had stood those poplars lank and lopped,
As they had raised it through the four years’ dance
Of Death in the now familiar flats of France;
And murmured, ‘Strange, this! How? All firing stopped?’

 

                                       VII
Aye; all was hushed. The about-to-fire fired not,
The aimed-at moved away in trance-lipped song.
One checkless regiment slung a clinching shot
And turned. The Spirit of Irony smirked out, ‘What?
Spoil peradventures woven of Rage and Wrong?’

 

                                       VIII
Thenceforth no flying fires inflamed the gray,
No hurtlings shook the dewdrop from the thorn,
No moan perplexed the mute bird on the spray;
Worn horses mused: ‘We are not whipped to-day;’
No weft-winged engines blurred the moon’s thin horn.

 

                                       IX
Calm fell. From Heaven distilled a clemency;
There was peace on earth, and silence in the sky;
Some could, some could not, shake off misery:
The Sinister Spirit sneered: ‘It had to be!’
And again the Spirit of Pity whispered, ‘Why?’

 

 

References and Footnotes

  1. Fussell, The Great War and Modern Memory, 291.
  2. This post, as so many, is under the distant-but-strong influence of Ursula Le Guin, esp., in this case, The Telling.
  3. The City that Shone, 244.
  4. Old Soldiers Never Die, 313-4.
  5. The Ordeal of Alfred M. Hale, 146.
  6. Quoted in Anne Williamson, Henry Williamson and the First World War, 184.
  7. Elton, C.E. Montague, 225-6.
  8. Diaries, 142.
  9. The quotation is from the 17th c. poet Thomas St. Nicholas; A Passionate Prodigality, 272-3.
  10. The Last Fighting Tommy, 127-8.
  11. Journal, 273-4.
  12. Laughter in the Next Room, 3-7.
  13. The Contrary Experience, 146.
  14. Diaries, 282.
  15. Diaries, 85.
  16. Lady Under Fire, 223.
  17. War Letters to a Wife, 349-52.
  18. Talking Across the World, 341.
  19. Saunders, Ford Madox Ford, II, 54.
  20. The Spanish Farm Trilogy, 770-2.
  21. A Test to Destruction, 340.
  22. Rough Justice, 361-2.
  23. Testament of Youth, 460-3.

Olaf Stapledon, First and Last

$
0
0

For Olaf Stapledon and Agnes Miller, the sudden-seeming end to the war meant a collapse of the forces which had conspired to keep them half a world apart: now, after waiting for so many long months and years, they could marry without further delay. Or so they hoped.

A week after the armistice–when the fact that the war was really over hadn’t quite sunk in–Olaf had written to Agnes in disbelieving bliss.

18 November 1918

. . . I can’t realise the great change that has taken place in our affairs, nor the fact that you may be even now definitely determined to come soon. I wish I were free now. I wish the armistice were a fixed peace & my turn had already come to be demobilized. I wonder whether I shall go home & wait a little for you, or go home and go out to you, or go home and find you there. . . .

Stapledon’s account of his final reward for nearly four years of service in the Friends Ambulance Corps was appropriately low-key:

What next? Oh yes. This afternoon I was formally presented with my croix de guerre. The ceremony was simple. Brown, the second in command and acting chief, came along while I was going to tea, dug a packet out of his pocket and said, “Oh, glad I’ve met you: I can get rid of this.” A piece of tissue paper enclosed the bauble, a bronze cross backed by two crossed swords, with a tiny head of La République Frangaise in the centre, the whole hanging on the ribbon of which I sent you a snippet, and in the middle of the ribbon the modest bronze star…

So Olaf, though a pacifist, is also now a decorated veteran, and ready to come home and await his bride. But this is–this was–a modern war, and it will take a while for it all to wind down.

Olaf’s letter of today, a century back, finds him still in France, and it reminds us of the size of the gulf which they are striving to close. Our other lovers and married couples were only a few days away from each other by Royal Mail; for Olaf and Agnes it has been a matter of months.

SSA 13, 6 January 1919

…Well, girl, a dear letter came from you yesterday telling me about your interview with a benevolent gent on the subject of a passport. I laughed and could have danced for joy at that delightful incident, especially over the secret fact that the famous letter that you showed was the one  I subsequently said I wished I had never written. But in case of further difficulties–Agnes Miller, I do ask thee to be my wife. Agnes Miller, I ask thee to come straightaway to England to marry me. Agnes Miller, I implore thee to come. Agnes Miller, I love thee more than I love any other soul… I, Olaf Stapledon, need thee Agnes Miller, and beg thee to come to England at once…[1]

She will do her best, and this letter, joyfully fitting the Quaker form of address to the requirements of government officials, is the last to be sent to her home in Australia. Yet it will still be two months before Agnes departs: she will end up waiting for a Blue Funnel Line ship (Olaf’s father had an interest in the company) and sailing west, stopping in India and going through Suez rather than east and overland through America, as they had originally planned.

Nor will Olaf have a quick ticket home. Just as his arrival in France was delayed by appendicitis, stomach troubles of a different sort will delay his return. He has developed a hernia–driving crank-started ambulances with no power steering is hard work–which he had been ignoring. But now it is serious enough to require surgery, by the very same doctor who had removed his appendix.

So today, a century back, there is joy on the horizon, but the lovers must wait for a blue funnel and a surgeon’s knife…

 

But who better to peer further into the future with than Olaf Stapledon? Always a dreamer, he will become the most original voice of mid-century science fiction, looking further into the future of humankind than anyone else. His most influential books–and although he will never quite become a household name, Stapledon’s influence on other writers will be profound–take the form of visionary future histories of the entire universe. His earnestness, curiosity, and speculative zeal let him pull off what, from most writers, would be vapid and unreadable self-indulgence. Adopting a “cosmic” point of view, speeding through aeons on every page, he will ask, with intense sincerity, what aeons of potential human experience might reveal about the human condition… yes, these books are very hard to describe.

Stapledon’s Last and First Men (1930) will be a surprise hit. It is part philosophy and part prognostication, part imagined history and part metaphysical poetry… and it will earn raves from, among others, Arnold Bennett (“There have been many visions of the future… But none in my experience as strange… Mr, Stapledon possesses a tremendous and beautiful imagination.”) and Virginia Woolf:

Dear Mr. Stapledon,

I would have thanked you for your book before, but I have been very busy and have only just had time to read it. I don’t suppose that I have understood more than a small part – all the same I have understood enough to be greatly interested, and elated too, since sometimes it seems to me that you are grasping ideas that I have tried to express, much more fumblingly, in fiction. But you have gone much further and I can’t help envying you – as one does those who reach what one has aimed at.

Many thanks for giving me a copy,
yours sincerely,
Virginia Woolf[2]

Perhaps this recommendation will win him more readers.

In any event, Stapledon escaped the backlash that often strikes out-of-nowhere literary innovators when it turned out that he was not just a dreamy dilettante but an accredited philosopher. While working as a volunteer adult educator–and relying on dividends from family investments (an irony for a socialist but one he acknowledged, writing “the system on which I live must go”)–Stapledon earned a PhD from Liverpool University in 1925. He wrote several more works of speculative fiction which were openly influenced by H.G. Wells but more profoundly by Spinoza. Even as Stapledon remained active in antiwar, socialist, and internationalist anti-nationalist causes, he wrote reveries not just on international brotherhood but on the oneness of all human and meta-human experience, of striving toward an understanding not just of humanity, or humanity and the natural world, but of the place of the human mind in the universe.

While “science fiction” is a particularly inadequate term for writings which ended up arguing, essentially, for the oneness of human intellect, the cosmos, and the divine, this was the community that was most open to Stapledon’s ideas. He had no idea of his influence in the United States until, after the second war, he was sent there with a group of British cultural ambassadors. Though ignored by the more conventional writers (and, because of his politics, attacked in the American press and tailed by the FBI), he found a fervent community of admirers not among philosophers but among science fiction fans, and spent one long evening discussing his work with the members of the Hydra Club. Many of the writers of this circle–who were more taken, perhaps, with the scale of his future history, in which galactic empires rise and fall, than with the theological arguments that emerge from it–would go on to write large-scale fictions of their own. There is a direct line from Last and First Men and 1937’s Star Maker to Heinlein, Asimov, and George Lucas.

Back home, his influence faded. Stapledon was admired by many, but attacked by some of those admirers, including C.S. Lewis, who objected to Stapledon’s “desperately immoral outlook” and wrote the ham-handed “Space Trilogy” as a response–a first step toward establishing his particular brand, combining the forms of speculative fiction with orthodox Christian apologetics. Lewis would go on to write a more famous series of fantasy books in response to another Great War veteran’s books–those of his friend J.R.R. Tolkien. Tolkien’s books, of course, were neither “immoral” nor heretical, and in style and form they are about as different from Stapledon as two masterpieces of “Speculative Fiction” can be. Yet they have an essential kinship. Young men who read deeply and dreamed intensely–and who had seen the horrors of the war–they each set about making their own worlds, and tended to them with total commitment and complete indifference to the disdain with which this sort of intellectual play was treated. Lewis was a convert who became a popularizer, cobbling together worlds to expound an established tradition in a new way; Tolkien, a lifelong Catholic, had confidence in his God–that is, faith–and so made his own world, vast but enclosed, as a loyal “sub-creator;” Stapledon, lapsed Quaker and reinvigorated pantheist, was a searcher, and he wrote his fiction to explore the immensity of future possibility.

Most of us would rather embrace some ready-made hagiography of boy wizards or charismatic lions than read through an account of an ordinary man striving to understand that which is infinitely greater than himself. But this struggle, this desire to know, this conviction that even when empirical evidence is scarce rational explanations are still within reach—this is the spirit that has propelled mankind forward for centuries, and it must continue to be ours: The key to human evolution, Stapledon would argue, is to cultivate an open mind.[3]

 

So, yes, Olaf Stapledon, ambulance driver, will go on to an interesting literary career. But what about Olaf Stapledon, ardent lover? Isn’t that the man whose letters we’ve been reading?

It’s a good story–mostly happy. Agnes Miller did catch that boat and finally arrived in England at the end of the spring. There was an immediate crisis: she, a young woman on her own for the first time, had fallen half in love with an officer on the months-long voyage from Australia. But, with the help of some time apart and then some supervised time together again on a family holiday (they are, remember, cousins) in Wales, this unconsummated dalliance was forgotten and forgiven, and the plans for the wedding went ahead.

Olaf and Agnes were married in the Friends’ Meeting House in Reigate, Surrey, on July 16 1919. They drove off for their honeymoon in the Lake District in the same Sunbeam ambulance which Olaf had driven to the war and back. They were young and happy and they figured out the physical side of things quickly: their daughter Mary was born in May 1920, with a son, John, following in 1923. (If a quick internet search found the right John David Stapledon, then he died a great-grandfather in 2013, and Agnes and Olaf have reached the future at least as far as a fifth generation.)

It wasn’t all smooth. I haven’t read Robert Crossley’s biography (I’m working largely from the notes to his earlier publication of the letters, Talking Across the World) and I can’t really speak to the long-term health of their marriage. In one article discussing Crossley’s book there is a disheartening mention of a later phase in which Olaf apparently declared that he, still young in body while she had aged (she was eight years younger), should be free to seek an “open marriage.” I don’t know if this lapse into conventional male physicality indicates a time of trouble that was overcome or a harbinger of doom.

Olaf Stapledon died suddenly in 1950, at the age of 64, only a year after that dinner with his American fans. He was soon more or less forgotten by the larger literary community, and fell out of print. He was influential to and beloved by a core of fans, but that was not enough to make him a subject of study or to win republication of his books in the sixties and seventies, when science fiction began to go mainstream.

So here’s the last anecdote. Agnes outlived her husband by thirty-three years: their relationship had begun as a strange figment in Olaf’s mind and it ended as a slowly attenuating mountain of memories in hers. He nurtured a love for his nine-year-old cousin until she grew up and returned his love and came across the world to marry him; and after he died she preserved what she could. When Robert Crossley came to see the widow Stapledon, only a few years before her own death, she handed him the keys to her late husband’s study, and there it was, completely unchanged for three decades. It was arranged for Stapledon’s working papers to go to the University of Liverpool, but it later turned out that Agnes had kept two suitcases back. These too eventually came to the young American scholar. “Inside,” wrote Crossley, “tied into neat bundles with coarse brown twine, were many hundreds of letters from Olaf Stapledon to Agnes Miller,” along with many many–though far fewer–of hers to him.

 

References and Footnotes

  1. Talking Across the World, 342-52.
  2. The letter, available here, was first published by Kim Stanley Robinson on New Scientist.com.
  3. Liel Leibovitz, writing in Tablet. See also Moscowitz, Explorers of the Infinite (reprinted as intro to Darkness and the Light, 1974).




Latest Images